Implementing Reporting Standards for Polygenic Risk Scores for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of Review: There is considerable interest in using polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for assessing risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). A barrier to the clinical use of PRSs is heterogeneity in how PRS studies are reported. In this review, we summarize approaches to establish a uniform reporting framework for PRSs for coronary heart disease (CHD), the most common form of ASCVD. Recent Findings: Reporting standards for PRSs need to be contextualized for disease specific applications. Summary: In addition to metrics of predictive performance, reporting standards for PRSs for CHD should include how cases/control were ascertained, degree of adjustment for conventional CHD risk factors, portability to diverse genetic ancestry groups and admixed individuals, and quality control measures for clinical deployment. Such a framework will enable PRSs to be optimized and benchmarked for clinical use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-330
Number of pages8
JournalCurrent atherosclerosis reports
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Atherosclerosis
  • Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
  • Coronary heart disease
  • Polygenic risk score
  • Reporting standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementing Reporting Standards for Polygenic Risk Scores for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this