TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Serum Cystatin C–Based Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimates on Drug Dose Selection in Hospitalized Patients
AU - Peters, Bradley J.
AU - Rule, Andrew D.
AU - Kashani, Kianoush B.
AU - Lieske, John C.
AU - Mara, Kristin C.
AU - Dierkhising, Ross A.
AU - Barreto, Erin F.
N1 - Funding Information:
Support: This study was funded in part by the Mayo Clinic Department of Pharmacy, Rochester, MN. Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article. *Address for correspondence: Erin F. Barreto, Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905; e-mail: barreto.erin@mayo.edu. © 2018 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Study Objective: Serum creatinine (Sc r) concentration is used to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for medication dosing. Serum cystatin C (CysC) concentration has been proposed as an adjunct or alternative to Scr. This study sought to evaluate the possible impact of using CysC in eGFR equations on drug dose recommendations in hospitalized patients with infections. Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Setting: Large academic tertiary care medical center. Patients: A total of 308 adults with suspected or documented infections and stable kidney function who were hospitalized between 2012 and 2015. Measurements and Main Results: Standardized Sc r and CysC measured at the time of antibiotic dosing were used to estimate GFR from the three Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaborative (CKD-EPI) equations using Sc r (eGFRCr), CysC(eGFRCysC), or a combination of Sc r and CysC (eGFRCr-CysC), and these values were compared with estimated creatinine clearance (eClcr) from the Cockcroft-Gault equation (standard of care for drug dosage adjustments). The eGFRs were categorized into five common dosage adjustment strata (lower than 20, 20–49, 50–79, 80–130, and higher than 130 ml/min), and agreement between equations was tested with the weighted κ statistic. Recommended drug doses varied considerably between the eClcr and the CKD-EPI equations (weighted κ [95% confidence interval]: eGFRCr 0.73 [0.68–0.79], eGFRCysC 0.42 [0.35–0.5], eGFRCr-CysC 0.65 [0.6–0.71]). If eGFRCr, eGFRCysC, or eGFRCr-CysC were used instead of eClcr to dose drugs, 11%, 12%, and 8% of doses, respectively, would be higher, and 12%, 38%, and 24% of doses, respectively, would be lower. Conclusion: Significant discordance in drug doses was observed when the CKD-EPI equations were used in place of eClcr. When CysC was included in eGFR equations, recommended doses were often lower. Further study is needed to develop and test drug-specific dosing guidelines that incorporate alternate renal biomarkers and/or more contemporary eGFR equations.
AB - Study Objective: Serum creatinine (Sc r) concentration is used to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for medication dosing. Serum cystatin C (CysC) concentration has been proposed as an adjunct or alternative to Scr. This study sought to evaluate the possible impact of using CysC in eGFR equations on drug dose recommendations in hospitalized patients with infections. Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Setting: Large academic tertiary care medical center. Patients: A total of 308 adults with suspected or documented infections and stable kidney function who were hospitalized between 2012 and 2015. Measurements and Main Results: Standardized Sc r and CysC measured at the time of antibiotic dosing were used to estimate GFR from the three Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaborative (CKD-EPI) equations using Sc r (eGFRCr), CysC(eGFRCysC), or a combination of Sc r and CysC (eGFRCr-CysC), and these values were compared with estimated creatinine clearance (eClcr) from the Cockcroft-Gault equation (standard of care for drug dosage adjustments). The eGFRs were categorized into five common dosage adjustment strata (lower than 20, 20–49, 50–79, 80–130, and higher than 130 ml/min), and agreement between equations was tested with the weighted κ statistic. Recommended drug doses varied considerably between the eClcr and the CKD-EPI equations (weighted κ [95% confidence interval]: eGFRCr 0.73 [0.68–0.79], eGFRCysC 0.42 [0.35–0.5], eGFRCr-CysC 0.65 [0.6–0.71]). If eGFRCr, eGFRCysC, or eGFRCr-CysC were used instead of eClcr to dose drugs, 11%, 12%, and 8% of doses, respectively, would be higher, and 12%, 38%, and 24% of doses, respectively, would be lower. Conclusion: Significant discordance in drug doses was observed when the CKD-EPI equations were used in place of eClcr. When CysC was included in eGFR equations, recommended doses were often lower. Further study is needed to develop and test drug-specific dosing guidelines that incorporate alternate renal biomarkers and/or more contemporary eGFR equations.
KW - antibiotics
KW - augmented renal clearance
KW - biomarker
KW - creatinine clearance
KW - cystatin C
KW - glomerular filtration rate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053395667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053395667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/phar.2175
DO - 10.1002/phar.2175
M3 - Article
C2 - 30120844
AN - SCOPUS:85053395667
SN - 0277-0008
VL - 38
SP - 1068
EP - 1073
JO - Pharmacotherapy
JF - Pharmacotherapy
IS - 10
ER -