TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of a Multimedia e-Learning Module on Colon Cancer Literacy
T2 - A Community-Based Pilot Study
AU - Holubar, Stefan D.
AU - Hassinger, J. Peyton
AU - Dozois, Eric J.
AU - Wolff, Bruce G.
AU - Kehoe, Michael
AU - Cima, Robert R.
PY - 2009/10/1
Y1 - 2009/10/1
N2 - Background: We aimed to determine if an e-learning module could improve colon cancer literacy in a community-based cohort, while obtaining variability estimates for subsequent study. Methods: A convenience sample of subjects attending a health-education fair was surveyed to determine colon cancer literacy before-and-after viewing a colon cancer e-learning module. The difference in cancer literacy scores was assessed for significance using univariate analysis. Results: Twenty-two eligible subjects completed the survey: mean age 77.2 ± 7.5 y, 55% women; 67% had at least some graduate-level education. Baseline colon cancer literacy was 72.6% ± 11.6%; after the e-learning module, the mean colon cancer literacy score was 75.5% ± 12.2%, representing a 3% improvement (P = 0.33). After excluding a single problematic item identified by item analysis, the adjusted improvement was 7% (P = 0.04). Invasiveness, malignant, and metastatic remained poorly understood concepts, while a large improvement (45%) was seen regarding the role of routine lymphadenectomy. Subject satisfaction with the module was universally (100%) high or very high. Conclusions: Use of an e-learning module is associated with high patient satisfaction, and has potential to improve colon cancer literacy in laypersons. Randomized study is warranted to determine the incremental impact of this and other multimedia educational interventions.
AB - Background: We aimed to determine if an e-learning module could improve colon cancer literacy in a community-based cohort, while obtaining variability estimates for subsequent study. Methods: A convenience sample of subjects attending a health-education fair was surveyed to determine colon cancer literacy before-and-after viewing a colon cancer e-learning module. The difference in cancer literacy scores was assessed for significance using univariate analysis. Results: Twenty-two eligible subjects completed the survey: mean age 77.2 ± 7.5 y, 55% women; 67% had at least some graduate-level education. Baseline colon cancer literacy was 72.6% ± 11.6%; after the e-learning module, the mean colon cancer literacy score was 75.5% ± 12.2%, representing a 3% improvement (P = 0.33). After excluding a single problematic item identified by item analysis, the adjusted improvement was 7% (P = 0.04). Invasiveness, malignant, and metastatic remained poorly understood concepts, while a large improvement (45%) was seen regarding the role of routine lymphadenectomy. Subject satisfaction with the module was universally (100%) high or very high. Conclusions: Use of an e-learning module is associated with high patient satisfaction, and has potential to improve colon cancer literacy in laypersons. Randomized study is warranted to determine the incremental impact of this and other multimedia educational interventions.
KW - colon cancer
KW - computer-assisted instruction
KW - e-learning
KW - education
KW - individualized medicine
KW - multimedia
KW - patient literacy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249087618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70249087618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.099
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.099
M3 - Article
C2 - 19631335
AN - SCOPUS:70249087618
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 156
SP - 305
EP - 311
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
IS - 2
ER -