TY - JOUR
T1 - Image-based metric of invasiveness predicts response to adjuvant temozolomide for primary glioblastoma
AU - Massey, Susan Christine
AU - White, Haylye
AU - Whitmire, Paula
AU - Doyle, Tatum
AU - Johnston, Sandra K.
AU - Singleton, Kyle W.
AU - Jackson, Pamela R.
AU - Hawkins-Daarud, Andrea
AU - Bendok, Bernard R.
AU - Porter, Alyx B.
AU - Vora, Sujay
AU - Sarkaria, Jann N.
AU - Hu, Leland S.
AU - Mrugala, Maciej M.
AU - Swanson, Kristin R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NIH R01NS060752 (KRS), R01CA164371 (KRS), U54CA210180 (JNS,KRS), U54CA143970 (KRS), U54CA193489 (KRS), and U01CA220378 (KRS), the Arizona Biomedical Research Commission ADHS16-162514 (KRS), the James S. McDonnell Foundation, and the Ben & Catherine Ivy Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Massey et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background Temozolomide (TMZ) has been the standard-of-care chemotherapy for glioblastoma (GBM) patients for more than a decade. Despite this long time in use, significant questions remain regarding how best to optimize TMZ therapy for individual patients. Understanding the relationship between TMZ response and factors such as number of adjuvant TMZ cycles, patient age, patient sex, and image–based tumor features, might help predict which GBM patients would benefit most from TMZ, particularly for those whose tumors lack O6–methyl-guanine–DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Methods and findings Using a cohort of 90 newly–diagnosed GBM patients treated according to the standard of care, we examined the relationships between several patient and tumor characteristics and volumetric and survival outcomes during adjuvant chemotherapy. Volumetric changes in MR imaging abnormalities during adjuvant therapy were used to assess TMZ response. T1Gd volumetric response is associated with younger patient age, increased number of TMZ cycles, longer time to nadir volume, and decreased tumor invasiveness. Moreover, increased adjuvant TMZ cycles corresponded with improved volumetric response only among more nodular tumors, and this volumetric response was associated with improved survival outcomes. Finally, in a subcohort of patients with known MGMT methylation status, methylated tumors were more diffusely invasive than unmethylated tumors, suggesting the improved response in nodular tumors is not driven by a preponderance of MGMT methylated tumors. Conclusions Our finding that less diffusely invasive tumors are associated with greater volumetric response to TMZ suggests patients with these tumors may benefit from additional adjuvant TMZ cycles, even for those without MGMT methylation.
AB - Background Temozolomide (TMZ) has been the standard-of-care chemotherapy for glioblastoma (GBM) patients for more than a decade. Despite this long time in use, significant questions remain regarding how best to optimize TMZ therapy for individual patients. Understanding the relationship between TMZ response and factors such as number of adjuvant TMZ cycles, patient age, patient sex, and image–based tumor features, might help predict which GBM patients would benefit most from TMZ, particularly for those whose tumors lack O6–methyl-guanine–DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Methods and findings Using a cohort of 90 newly–diagnosed GBM patients treated according to the standard of care, we examined the relationships between several patient and tumor characteristics and volumetric and survival outcomes during adjuvant chemotherapy. Volumetric changes in MR imaging abnormalities during adjuvant therapy were used to assess TMZ response. T1Gd volumetric response is associated with younger patient age, increased number of TMZ cycles, longer time to nadir volume, and decreased tumor invasiveness. Moreover, increased adjuvant TMZ cycles corresponded with improved volumetric response only among more nodular tumors, and this volumetric response was associated with improved survival outcomes. Finally, in a subcohort of patients with known MGMT methylation status, methylated tumors were more diffusely invasive than unmethylated tumors, suggesting the improved response in nodular tumors is not driven by a preponderance of MGMT methylated tumors. Conclusions Our finding that less diffusely invasive tumors are associated with greater volumetric response to TMZ suggests patients with these tumors may benefit from additional adjuvant TMZ cycles, even for those without MGMT methylation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082490213&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082490213&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0230492
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0230492
M3 - Article
C2 - 32218600
AN - SCOPUS:85082490213
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 15
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 3
M1 - e0230492
ER -