TY - JOUR
T1 - How i manage monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
AU - Go, Ronald S.
AU - Vincent Rajkumar, S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by research funding from the Mark A. and Elizabeth N. Binks Fund, from the Mayo Clinic Department of Medicine Innovation Award, and by research grants from the National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute (CA107476, CA168762, and CA186781).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.
PY - 2018/1/11
Y1 - 2018/1/11
N2 - Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is, in many ways, a unique hematologic entity. Unlike most hematologic conditions in which the diagnosis is intentional and credited to hematologists, the discovery of MGUS is most often incidental and made by nonhematologists. MGUS is considered an obligate precursor to several lymphoplasmacytic malignancies, including immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis, multiple myeloma, and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Therefore, long-term follow-up is generally recommended. Despite its high prevalence, there is surprisingly limited evidence to inform best clinical practice both at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up. We present 7 vignettes to illustrate common clinical management questions that arise during the course of MGUS. Where evidence is present, we provide a concise summary of the literature and clear recommendations on management. Where evidence is lacking, we describe how we practice and provide a rationale for our approach. We also discuss the potential harms associated with MGUS diagnosis, a topic that is rarely, if ever, broached between patients and providers, or even considered in academic debate.
AB - Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is, in many ways, a unique hematologic entity. Unlike most hematologic conditions in which the diagnosis is intentional and credited to hematologists, the discovery of MGUS is most often incidental and made by nonhematologists. MGUS is considered an obligate precursor to several lymphoplasmacytic malignancies, including immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis, multiple myeloma, and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Therefore, long-term follow-up is generally recommended. Despite its high prevalence, there is surprisingly limited evidence to inform best clinical practice both at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up. We present 7 vignettes to illustrate common clinical management questions that arise during the course of MGUS. Where evidence is present, we provide a concise summary of the literature and clear recommendations on management. Where evidence is lacking, we describe how we practice and provide a rationale for our approach. We also discuss the potential harms associated with MGUS diagnosis, a topic that is rarely, if ever, broached between patients and providers, or even considered in academic debate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040454259&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040454259&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1182/blood-2017-09-807560
DO - 10.1182/blood-2017-09-807560
M3 - Article
C2 - 29183887
AN - SCOPUS:85040454259
SN - 0006-4971
VL - 131
SP - 163
EP - 173
JO - Blood
JF - Blood
IS - 2
ER -