High-fidelity, low-cost, automated method to assess laparoscopic skills objectively

Richard J. Gray, Kanav Kahol, Gazi Islam, Marshall Smith, Alyssa Chapital, John Ferrara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: We sought to define the extent to which a motion analysis-based assessment system constructed with simple equipment could measure technical skill objectively and quantitatively. Methods: An "off-the-shelf" digital video system was used to capture the hand and instrument movement of surgical trainees (beginner level = PGY-1, intermediate level = PGY-3, and advanced level = PGY-5/fellows) while they performed a peg transfer exercise. The video data were passed through a custom computer vision algorithm that analyzed incoming pixels to measure movement smoothness objectively. Results: The beginner-level group had the poorest performance, whereas those in the advanced group generated the highest scores. Intermediate-level trainees scored significantly (p < 0.04) better than beginner trainees. Advanced-level trainees scored significantly better than intermediate-level trainees and beginner-level trainees (p < 0.04 and p < 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: A computer vision-based analysis of surgical movements provides an objective basis for technical expertise-level analysis with construct validity. The technology to capture the data is simple, low cost, and readily available, and it obviates the need for expert human assessment in this setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-339
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Surgical Education
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012

Keywords

  • Lucas-Kanade optical flow
  • technical assessment
  • technical skills
  • video-based analysis instrument

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High-fidelity, low-cost, automated method to assess laparoscopic skills objectively'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this