TY - JOUR
T1 - Genome-wide analysis of common copy number variation and epithelial ovarian cancer risk
AU - Reid, Brett M.
AU - Permuth, Jennifer B.
AU - Ann Chen, Y.
AU - Fridley, Brooke L.
AU - Iversen, Edwin S.
AU - Chen, Zhihua
AU - Jim, Heather
AU - Vierkant, Robert A.
AU - Cunningham, Julie M.
AU - Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S.
AU - Narod, Steven
AU - Risch, Harvey
AU - Schildkraut, Joellen M.
AU - Goode, Ellen L.
AU - Monteiro, Alvaro N.
AU - Sellers, Thomas A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank all of the women who participated, along with all of the researchers, clinicians, and staff who have contributed to the participating studies. This work was supported by NIH R01 CA114343 and U19 CA148112 (to T.A. Sellers), R01 CA122443 (to E.L. Goode), R01 CA76016
Funding Information:
(to J.M. Schildkraut), R01 CA106414 (to R. Sutphen), P30 CA15083 for the Mayo Clinic Genotyping Shared Resource, and Mayo Clinic Ovarian Cancer SPORE grant P50 CA136393.
Publisher Copyright:
2019 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: Germline DNA copy number variation (CNV) is a ubiquitous source of genetic variation and remains largely unexplored in association with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. Methods: CNV was quantified in the DNA of approximately 3,500 cases and controls genotyped with the Illumina 610k and HumanOmni2.5M arrays. We performed a genome-wide association study of common (>1%) CNV regions (CNVRs) with EOC and high-grade serous (HGSOC) risk and, using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), performed in silico analyses of tumor-gene expression. Results: Three CNVRs were associated (P < 0.01) with EOC risk: two large (100 kb) regions within the 610k set and one small (<5 kb) region with the higher resolution 2.5M data. Large CNVRs included a duplication at LILRA6 (OR ¼ 2.57; P ¼ 0.001) and a deletion at CYP2A7 (OR ¼ 1.90; P ¼ 0.007) that were strongly associated with HGSOC risk (OR ¼ 3.02; P ¼ 8.98 105). Somatic CYP2A7 alterations correlated with EGLN2 expression in tumors (P ¼ 2.94 1047). An intronic ERBB4/HER4 deletion was associated with reduced EOC risk (OR ¼ 0.33; P ¼ 9.5 102), and somatic deletions correlated with ERBB4 downregulation (P ¼ 7.05 105). Five CNVRs were associated with HGSOC, including two reduced-risk deletions: one at 1p36.33 (OR ¼ 0.28; P ¼ 0.001) that correlated with lower CDKIIA expression in TCGA tumors (P ¼ 2.7 107), and another at 8p21.2 (OR ¼ 0.52; P ¼ 0.002) that was present somatically where it correlated with lower GNRH1 expression (P ¼ 5.9 105). Conclusions: Though CNV appears to not contribute largely to EOC susceptibility, a number of low-to-common frequency variants may influence the risk of EOC and tumor-gene expression. Impact: Further research on CNV and EOC susceptibility is warranted, particularly with CNVs estimated from high-density arrays.
AB - Background: Germline DNA copy number variation (CNV) is a ubiquitous source of genetic variation and remains largely unexplored in association with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. Methods: CNV was quantified in the DNA of approximately 3,500 cases and controls genotyped with the Illumina 610k and HumanOmni2.5M arrays. We performed a genome-wide association study of common (>1%) CNV regions (CNVRs) with EOC and high-grade serous (HGSOC) risk and, using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), performed in silico analyses of tumor-gene expression. Results: Three CNVRs were associated (P < 0.01) with EOC risk: two large (100 kb) regions within the 610k set and one small (<5 kb) region with the higher resolution 2.5M data. Large CNVRs included a duplication at LILRA6 (OR ¼ 2.57; P ¼ 0.001) and a deletion at CYP2A7 (OR ¼ 1.90; P ¼ 0.007) that were strongly associated with HGSOC risk (OR ¼ 3.02; P ¼ 8.98 105). Somatic CYP2A7 alterations correlated with EGLN2 expression in tumors (P ¼ 2.94 1047). An intronic ERBB4/HER4 deletion was associated with reduced EOC risk (OR ¼ 0.33; P ¼ 9.5 102), and somatic deletions correlated with ERBB4 downregulation (P ¼ 7.05 105). Five CNVRs were associated with HGSOC, including two reduced-risk deletions: one at 1p36.33 (OR ¼ 0.28; P ¼ 0.001) that correlated with lower CDKIIA expression in TCGA tumors (P ¼ 2.7 107), and another at 8p21.2 (OR ¼ 0.52; P ¼ 0.002) that was present somatically where it correlated with lower GNRH1 expression (P ¼ 5.9 105). Conclusions: Though CNV appears to not contribute largely to EOC susceptibility, a number of low-to-common frequency variants may influence the risk of EOC and tumor-gene expression. Impact: Further research on CNV and EOC susceptibility is warranted, particularly with CNVs estimated from high-density arrays.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068805761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068805761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0833
DO - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0833
M3 - Article
C2 - 30948450
AN - SCOPUS:85068805761
SN - 1055-9965
VL - 28
SP - 1117
EP - 1126
JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
IS - 7
ER -