Genetic susceptibility testing for beryllium: Worker knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes

Ken Silver, Gary Kukulka, John Gorniewicz, Kathleen Rayman, Richard Sharp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Background: We sought to gain insight into workers' knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes on the subject of testing for genetic susceptibility to beryllium. Methods: Five focus groups were held with 30 current and former beryllium workers and nine family members. Audio recordings were transcribed and assessed by hierarchical coding using an inductive approach. Results: Some workers were unclear about the distinction between genotoxicity and heritability. A key finding is that they perceived the benefits of a positive test result to be related to enhanced autonomous decision-making. The major concern cited by participants was potential abuse of genetic information by employers. Complete financial separation of a prospective testing entity from the employer was seen as crucial. Conclusions: A window of opportunity exists to create regional partnerships for translational research on genetic susceptibility testing. Such partnerships would involve labor, management, public health scientists, primary care professionals, and other stakeholders. They would be critical to identifying testing strategies that maximize worker autonomy along with the public health advantages of genetic testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)521-532
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 2011


  • Beryllium
  • Department of Energy
  • Genetic testing
  • Los Alamos
  • Oak Ridge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health


Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic susceptibility testing for beryllium: Worker knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this