Gedeelde besluitvorming is een debat met geschillen

Victor M. Montori; Marleen Kunneman; Anne M. Stiggelbout

Gedeelde besluitvorming is een debat met geschillen

Translated title of the contribution: Shared decision-making is a debate with disputes

Victor M. Montori, Marleen Kunneman, Anne M. Stiggelbout

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Dutch Journal of Medicine (NTvG) invited a group of clinicians and academics to its office to debate the role of shared decisionmaking in contemporary medical practice. Through a series of brief presentations and extensive discussion and debate, participants sought to understand the nature of the differences between those who advocate for and against this practice. This paper summarises our position, solidly in the first camp, and reflects our appreciation for the nature of the controversy.

Translated title of the contribution	Shared decision-making is a debate with disputes
Original language	Dutch
Article number	D2095
Journal	Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
Volume	161
Issue number	36
State	Published - 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Medicine

Cite this

@article{6cbe984fa5164f4bbc8297c3ad1393df,

title = "Gedeelde besluitvorming is een debat met geschillen",

abstract = "The Dutch Journal of Medicine (NTvG) invited a group of clinicians and academics to its office to debate the role of shared decisionmaking in contemporary medical practice. Through a series of brief presentations and extensive discussion and debate, participants sought to understand the nature of the differences between those who advocate for and against this practice. This paper summarises our position, solidly in the first camp, and reflects our appreciation for the nature of the controversy.",

author = "Montori, {Victor M.} and Marleen Kunneman and Stiggelbout, {Anne M.}",

year = "2017",

language = "Dutch",

volume = "161",

journal = "Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde",

issn = "0028-2162",

publisher = "Bohn Stafleu van Loghum",

number = "36",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gedeelde besluitvorming is een debat met geschillen

AU - Montori, Victor M.

AU - Kunneman, Marleen

AU - Stiggelbout, Anne M.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The Dutch Journal of Medicine (NTvG) invited a group of clinicians and academics to its office to debate the role of shared decisionmaking in contemporary medical practice. Through a series of brief presentations and extensive discussion and debate, participants sought to understand the nature of the differences between those who advocate for and against this practice. This paper summarises our position, solidly in the first camp, and reflects our appreciation for the nature of the controversy.

AB - The Dutch Journal of Medicine (NTvG) invited a group of clinicians and academics to its office to debate the role of shared decisionmaking in contemporary medical practice. Through a series of brief presentations and extensive discussion and debate, participants sought to understand the nature of the differences between those who advocate for and against this practice. This paper summarises our position, solidly in the first camp, and reflects our appreciation for the nature of the controversy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029215192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029215192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85029215192

SN - 0028-2162

VL - 161

JO - Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

JF - Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

IS - 36

M1 - D2095

ER -

Gedeelde besluitvorming is een debat met geschillen

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this