TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional outcomes of nerve allografts augmented with mesenchymal stem cells and surgical angiogenesis in a rat sciatic nerve defect model
AU - Bedar, Meiwand
AU - Saffari, Tiam M.
AU - Mathot, Femke
AU - Shin, Alexander Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background: Motor function recovery following acellular nerve allograft (ANA) repair remains inferior to autologous nerve reconstruction. We investigated the functional recovery of ANAs after combined mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) delivery and surgical angiogenesis in a rat sciatic nerve defect model. Methods: In 100 Lewis rats, unilateral sciatic nerve defects were reconstructed with (I) autografts, (II) ANAs, (III) ANAs wrapped with a superficial inferior epigastric artery fascial (SIEF) flap, combined with either (IV) undifferentiated MSCs or (V) Schwann cell-like differentiated MSCs. The tibialis anterior muscle area was evaluated during the survival period using ultrasonography. Functional recovery, histomorphometry, and immunofluorescence were assessed at 12 and 16 weeks. Results: At 12 weeks, the addition of surgical angiogenesis and MSCs improved ankle contractures. The SIEF flap also significantly improved compound muscle action potential (CMAP) outcomes compared with ANAs. Autografts outperformed all groups in muscle force and weight. At 16 weeks, ankle contractures of ANAs remained inferior to autografts and SIEF, whereas the CMAP amplitude was comparable between groups. The muscle force of autografts remained superior to all other groups, and the muscle weight of ANAs remained inferior to autografts. No differences were found in histomorphometry outcomes between SIEF groups and ANAs. Vascularity, determined by CD34 staining, was significantly higher in SIEF groups compared with ANAs. Conclusions: The combination of surgical angiogenesis and MSCs did not result in a synergistic improvement in functional outcomes. In a short nerve gap model, the adipofascial flap may provide sufficient MSCs to ANAs without additional ex vivo MSC seeding.
AB - Background: Motor function recovery following acellular nerve allograft (ANA) repair remains inferior to autologous nerve reconstruction. We investigated the functional recovery of ANAs after combined mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) delivery and surgical angiogenesis in a rat sciatic nerve defect model. Methods: In 100 Lewis rats, unilateral sciatic nerve defects were reconstructed with (I) autografts, (II) ANAs, (III) ANAs wrapped with a superficial inferior epigastric artery fascial (SIEF) flap, combined with either (IV) undifferentiated MSCs or (V) Schwann cell-like differentiated MSCs. The tibialis anterior muscle area was evaluated during the survival period using ultrasonography. Functional recovery, histomorphometry, and immunofluorescence were assessed at 12 and 16 weeks. Results: At 12 weeks, the addition of surgical angiogenesis and MSCs improved ankle contractures. The SIEF flap also significantly improved compound muscle action potential (CMAP) outcomes compared with ANAs. Autografts outperformed all groups in muscle force and weight. At 16 weeks, ankle contractures of ANAs remained inferior to autografts and SIEF, whereas the CMAP amplitude was comparable between groups. The muscle force of autografts remained superior to all other groups, and the muscle weight of ANAs remained inferior to autografts. No differences were found in histomorphometry outcomes between SIEF groups and ANAs. Vascularity, determined by CD34 staining, was significantly higher in SIEF groups compared with ANAs. Conclusions: The combination of surgical angiogenesis and MSCs did not result in a synergistic improvement in functional outcomes. In a short nerve gap model, the adipofascial flap may provide sufficient MSCs to ANAs without additional ex vivo MSC seeding.
KW - Acellular nerve allograft
KW - Functional motor outcomes
KW - Mesenchymal stem cells
KW - Peripheral nerve injury
KW - Schwann cell-like cells
KW - Surgical angiogenesis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175461405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85175461405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.054
DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.054
M3 - Article
C2 - 37925923
AN - SCOPUS:85175461405
SN - 1748-6815
VL - 87
SP - 329
EP - 338
JO - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
JF - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
ER -