TY - JOUR
T1 - First-line doublet chemotherapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
T2 - Circulating tumor cell analysis of the tnAcity trial
AU - Liu, Minetta C.
AU - Janni, Wolfgang
AU - Georgoulias, Vassilis
AU - Yardley, Denise A.
AU - Harbeck, Nadia
AU - Wei, Xin
AU - McGovern, Desmond
AU - Beck, Robert
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Celgene Corporation (no grant number applies). Medical writing assistance was provided by Mihaela Marina, PhD, of MediTech Media, Ltd, funded by Celgene Corporation. This paper was presented at the 2018 American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting as a poster presentation with interim findings. The poster abstract was published in Cancer Res. 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract 4209.
Funding Information:
Dr Liu reports nonfinancial support from MediTech Media during the conduct of the study, her institution received funding from Celgene to conduct the trial. Dr Liu had received clinical trial support from Eisai, Genentech, GRAIL, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Seattle Genetics and Tesaro. Dr Liu also received nonfinancial support from Ionis, nonfinancial support from Pfizer, nonfinancial support from Syndax, nonfinancial support from Agena, nonfinancial support from Cynvenio, and nonfinancial support from Menarini Silicon Biosystems outside the submitted work. Dr Janni reports grants from Celgene
Funding Information:
during the conduct of the study. Dr Yardley reports grants from Novartis during the conduct of the study. Sarah Cannon, the institution for which Dr Yardley serves as a research leader, has been paid for consulting/advisory roles from the following companies: Abraxis, Amgen, Alexion, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eisai, Lilly, Roche/Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Luitpold, Medivation, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, ProStrakan, Spectrum, Janssen, Ipsen, Novartis, R-Pharm US, Millennium, Seattle Genetics, Sanofi, Merck, Merrimack, AbbVie, Incyte, Concordia, Genzyme, Exelixis, Nippon Kayaku, Odonate, ELM Medical, Biotheranostics, and Hengrui; and funding for the conduct of research projects has been provided by the following companies: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BioMarin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Concordia, Eisai, Exelixis, Genentech, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, ImClone, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, Lilly, MedImmune, Medivation, Merck, Merrimack, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Spectrum, and Tesaro. Dr Harbeck reports personal fees from Celgene during the conduct of the study. Mr McGovern, Mr Beck and Dr Wei reports employment and stock options from Celgene during the conduct of the study. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Liu et al.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Purpose: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are prognostic biomarkers in metastatic breast cancer, but their role in predicting treatment outcomes in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is less clear. The tnAcity trial demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with nab-paclitaxel (nab-P)/carboplatin (C) over nab-P/gemcitabine (G) or G/C in patients with mTNBC. We assessed the correlation between CTC dynamics and clinical benefit in all patients and by treatment arm. Methods: CTC enumeration, performed using CELLSEARCH technology (Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Huntingdon Valley, PA, USA), was a prespecified exploratory endpoint in the tnAcity trial. Patients with TNBC were categorized based on pre-and post-treatment CTC levels: Group 1 (+ + +; elevated CTCs at baseline and postbaseline), Group 2 (+ ± ±; CTCs elevated at baseline and cleared postbaseline [cycle 3 and/or cycle 5]), or Group 3 (−; no CTCs detected at baseline). The baseline cutoff was ≥1 CTC/7.5 mL for the main analysis; cutoffs of ≥2 and ≥5 CTCs were used for supporting analyses. Results: The main analysis included 126 patients (Group 1, n = 24; Group 2, n = 54; and Group 3, n = 48). The median PFS was longer in Group 2 vs Group 1 (8.5 vs 4.7 months; HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.17–0.54]). These results were supported by the ≥2-and ≥5-CTC cutoff analyses. The median overall survival rates were 17.8, 16.0, and 9.8 months in Groups 2, 3, and 1, respectively. The overall response rates were 79.6%, 43.8%, and 29.2%, respectively. A numerically higher percentage of patients had CTC clearance during nab-P/C treatment vs nab-P/G or G/C. Conclusion: Efficacy outcomes trended positively with chemotherapy-induced elimination of CTCs, suggesting that CTC clearance may predict the chemosensitivity of mTNBC tumors. Trial registration: EudraCT Number: 2013-000113-20; ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01881230.
AB - Purpose: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are prognostic biomarkers in metastatic breast cancer, but their role in predicting treatment outcomes in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is less clear. The tnAcity trial demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with nab-paclitaxel (nab-P)/carboplatin (C) over nab-P/gemcitabine (G) or G/C in patients with mTNBC. We assessed the correlation between CTC dynamics and clinical benefit in all patients and by treatment arm. Methods: CTC enumeration, performed using CELLSEARCH technology (Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Huntingdon Valley, PA, USA), was a prespecified exploratory endpoint in the tnAcity trial. Patients with TNBC were categorized based on pre-and post-treatment CTC levels: Group 1 (+ + +; elevated CTCs at baseline and postbaseline), Group 2 (+ ± ±; CTCs elevated at baseline and cleared postbaseline [cycle 3 and/or cycle 5]), or Group 3 (−; no CTCs detected at baseline). The baseline cutoff was ≥1 CTC/7.5 mL for the main analysis; cutoffs of ≥2 and ≥5 CTCs were used for supporting analyses. Results: The main analysis included 126 patients (Group 1, n = 24; Group 2, n = 54; and Group 3, n = 48). The median PFS was longer in Group 2 vs Group 1 (8.5 vs 4.7 months; HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.17–0.54]). These results were supported by the ≥2-and ≥5-CTC cutoff analyses. The median overall survival rates were 17.8, 16.0, and 9.8 months in Groups 2, 3, and 1, respectively. The overall response rates were 79.6%, 43.8%, and 29.2%, respectively. A numerically higher percentage of patients had CTC clearance during nab-P/C treatment vs nab-P/G or G/C. Conclusion: Efficacy outcomes trended positively with chemotherapy-induced elimination of CTCs, suggesting that CTC clearance may predict the chemosensitivity of mTNBC tumors. Trial registration: EudraCT Number: 2013-000113-20; ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01881230.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Circulating tumor cells
KW - Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
KW - Nab-paclitaxel
KW - Prognosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076594479&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076594479&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2147/CMAR.S208712
DO - 10.2147/CMAR.S208712
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85076594479
SN - 1179-1322
VL - 11
SP - 10427
EP - 10433
JO - Cancer Management and Research
JF - Cancer Management and Research
ER -