Ethics in publication, part 2: Duplicate publishing, salami slicing, and large retrospective multicenter case series

Michael B. Wallace, Deborah Bowman, Hilary Hamilton-Gibbs, Peter D. Siersema

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Medical journals and their editors have a responsibility to ensure that what is published is scientifically rigorous, novel, and relevant to the journal's audience. Fortunately, most manuscripts submitted to our journals follow the basic principles of publication ethics. In the rare cases of suspected ethical violations, we vigorously investigate such activity while following international guidelines by COPE and ICMJE to ensure that improper manuscripts are not published, proper disciplinary activity is followed when violations are proven, but, at the same time, authors are guaranteed that they will be treated with a respectful and fair process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)463-465
Number of pages3
JournalEndoscopy
Volume50
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics in publication, part 2: Duplicate publishing, salami slicing, and large retrospective multicenter case series'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this