TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimation of Observer Performance for Reduced Radiation Dose Levels in CT
T2 - Eliminating Reduced Dose Levels That Are Too Low Is the First Step
AU - Fletcher, Joel G.
AU - Yu, Lifeng
AU - Fidler, Jeff L.
AU - Levin, David L.
AU - DeLone, David R.
AU - Hough, David M.
AU - Takahashi, Naoki
AU - Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
AU - Sykes, Anne Marie G.
AU - White, Darin
AU - Lindell, Rebecca M.
AU - Kotsenas, Amy L.
AU - Campeau, Norbert G.
AU - Lehman, Vance T.
AU - Bartley, Adam C.
AU - Leng, Shuai
AU - Holmes, David R.
AU - Toledano, Alicia Y.
AU - Carter, Rickey E.
AU - McCollough, Cynthia H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The project described was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers U01 EB17185 and R01 EB17095). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We appreciate the support of Dr. Kent Thielen, chair of the Department of Radiology at Mayo Clinic Rochester, for his commitment to ensure that a large number of staff could participate in this endeavor over a long period of time. We thank Kris Nunez for her assistance in the preparation of the manuscript and Maria Shiung, our study coordinator, for her assistance in managing the data collection.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Association of University Radiologists
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Rationale and Objectives This study aims to estimate observer performance for a range of dose levels for common computed tomography (CT) examinations (detection of liver metastases or pulmonary nodules, and cause of neurologic deficit) to prioritize noninferior dose levels for further analysis. Materials and Methods Using CT data from 131 examinations (abdominal CT, 44; chest CT, 44; head CT, 43), CT images corresponding to 4%–100% of the routine clinical dose were reconstructed with filtered back projection or iterative reconstruction. Radiologists evaluated CT images, marking specified targets, providing confidence scores, and grading image quality. Noninferiority was assessed using reference standards, reader agreement rules, and jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic figures of merit. Reader agreement required that a majority of readers at lower dose identify target lesions seen by the majority of readers at routine dose. Results Reader agreement identified dose levels lower than 50% and 4% to have inadequate performance for detection of hepatic metastases and pulmonary nodules, respectively, but could not exclude any low dose levels for head CT. Estimated differences in jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic figures of merit between routine and lower dose configurations found that only the lowest dose configurations tested (ie, 30%, 4%, and 10% of routine dose levels for abdominal, chest, and head CT examinations, respectively) did not meet criteria for noninferiority. At lower doses, subjective image quality declined before observer performance. Iterative reconstruction was only beneficial when filtered back projection did not result in noninferior performance. Conclusion Opportunity exists for substantial radiation dose reduction using existing CT technology for common diagnostic tasks.
AB - Rationale and Objectives This study aims to estimate observer performance for a range of dose levels for common computed tomography (CT) examinations (detection of liver metastases or pulmonary nodules, and cause of neurologic deficit) to prioritize noninferior dose levels for further analysis. Materials and Methods Using CT data from 131 examinations (abdominal CT, 44; chest CT, 44; head CT, 43), CT images corresponding to 4%–100% of the routine clinical dose were reconstructed with filtered back projection or iterative reconstruction. Radiologists evaluated CT images, marking specified targets, providing confidence scores, and grading image quality. Noninferiority was assessed using reference standards, reader agreement rules, and jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic figures of merit. Reader agreement required that a majority of readers at lower dose identify target lesions seen by the majority of readers at routine dose. Results Reader agreement identified dose levels lower than 50% and 4% to have inadequate performance for detection of hepatic metastases and pulmonary nodules, respectively, but could not exclude any low dose levels for head CT. Estimated differences in jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic figures of merit between routine and lower dose configurations found that only the lowest dose configurations tested (ie, 30%, 4%, and 10% of routine dose levels for abdominal, chest, and head CT examinations, respectively) did not meet criteria for noninferiority. At lower doses, subjective image quality declined before observer performance. Iterative reconstruction was only beneficial when filtered back projection did not result in noninferior performance. Conclusion Opportunity exists for substantial radiation dose reduction using existing CT technology for common diagnostic tasks.
KW - CT
KW - iterative reconstruction
KW - observer performance
KW - radiation dose
KW - radiation dose reduction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014106027&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014106027&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.017
DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 28262519
AN - SCOPUS:85014106027
SN - 1076-6332
VL - 24
SP - 876
EP - 890
JO - Academic radiology
JF - Academic radiology
IS - 7
ER -