Endocarditis risk with bioprosthetic and mechanical valves: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Mahesh Anantha-Narayanan, Yogesh N.V. Reddy, Varun Sundaram, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Patricia J. Erwin, Larry M. Baddour, Hartzell V. Schaff, Rick A. Nishimura

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Objective Bioprosthetic valves are being used with increased frequency for valve replacement, with controversy regarding risk:benefit ratio compared with mechanical valves in younger patients. However, prior studies have been too small to provide comparative estimates of less common but serious adverse events such as infective endocarditis. We aimed to compare the incidence of infective endocarditis between bioprosthetic valves and mechanical valves. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to April 2018 for studies comparing left-sided aortic and mitral bioprosthetic to mechanical valves for randomised trials or observational studies with propensity matching. We used random-effects model for our meta-analysis. Our primary outcome of interest was the rate of infective endocarditis at follow-up. Results 13 comparison groups with 43 941 patients were included. Mean age was 59±7 years with a mean follow-up of 10.4±5.0 years. Patients with bioprosthetic valves had a higher risk of infective endocarditis compared with patients receiving mechanical valves (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.88, p<0.001) with an absolute risk reduction of 9 per 1000 (95% CI 6 to 14). Heterogeneity within the included studies was low (I 2 =0%). Exclusion of the study with maximum weight did not change the results of the analysis (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.17, p=0.006). A meta-regression of follow-up time on incidence of infective endocarditis was not statistically significant (p=0.788) indicating difference in follow-up times did not alter the pooled risk of infective endocarditis. Conclusions Bioprosthetic valves may be associated with a higher risk of infective endocarditis. These data should help guide the discussion when deciding between bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in individual patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1413-1419
Number of pages7
Issue number18
StatePublished - Sep 1 2020


  • endocarditis
  • meta-analysis
  • systemic review
  • valve disease surgery
  • valvular heart disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Endocarditis risk with bioprosthetic and mechanical valves: Systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this