TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of Vedolizumab for Refractory Pouchitis of the Ileo-anal Pouch
T2 - Results from a Multicenter US Cohort
AU - Gregory, Martin
AU - Weaver, Kimberly N.
AU - Hoversten, Patrick
AU - Hicks, Stephen Bradley
AU - Patel, Devin
AU - Ciorba, Matthew A.
AU - Gutierrez, Alexandra M.
AU - Beniwal-Patel, Poonam
AU - Palam, Sowmya
AU - Syal, Gaurav
AU - Herfarth, Hans H.
AU - Christophi, George
AU - Raffals, Laura
AU - Barnes, Edward L.
AU - Deepak, Parakkal
N1 - Funding Information:
From the *Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; †Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; ‡Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; §Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; ¶Washington University Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; ‖Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; **Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; ††Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; ‡‡Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; §§Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; ***Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA Conflicts of Interest: MC is a member of the speakers bureau or has done consulting with UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, and Takeda and has received grant support from Incyte, AbbVie, and Takeda. AG is a member of the speakers bureau or has done consulting with AbbVie and Janssen. PBP has received a speaker’s fee from Takeda. HHH has received consulting fees from Artizan, Alivio, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celltrion, Finch, Lycera, Merck, Pfizer, and Seres and research support from Artizan and Pfizer. LER has received consulting fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals and an honorarium paid to the Mayo Clinic. ELB has received consulting fees from Janssen. PD has received consulting fees from Janssen and Pfizer, speaker fees from Abbvie and research grant from Takeda. KNW, MHG, SP, GS, PH, SBH, DP, and GC have no disclosures or conflicts of interest relevant to this study.
Funding Information:
Supported by: This work was supported by the American College of Gastroenterology Junior Faculty Development Award (PD), the Nickolas Bunn Boddie, Sr., and Lucy Mayo Boddie Foundation (ELB and HH), and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation (ELB). This work was also supported by Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA, Grant UL1 TR000448) and Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center and NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA091842). Inflammatory bowel disease research at Washington University is supported by the philanthropic Givin’ It All for Guts Foundation (www.givinitallforguts.org). We also acknowledge additional support from the WUSM DDRCC funded through NIDDK P30 DK052574 in the conduct of the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Crohn's & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Background and Aims: Inflammation of the pouch after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) can significantly impact quality of life and be difficult to treat. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch and chronic antibiotic-dependent or antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study at 5 academic referral centers in the United States. Adult patients with endoscopic inflammation of the pouch who received vedolizumab were included. The primary outcome was clinical response at any time point. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission, endoscopic response, and remission. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed for the effect of the following variables on clinical response: fistula, onset of pouchitis less than 1 year after IPAA, younger than 35 years old, gender, previous tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-alpha use, and BMI >30. Results: Eighty-three patients were treated with vedolizumab for inflammation of the pouch between January 2014 and October 2017. Median follow-up was 1.3 years (interquartile range 0.7-2.1). The proportion of patients that achieved at least a clinical response was 71.1%, with 19.3% achieving clinical remission. Of the 74 patients with a follow-up pouchoscopy, the proportion of patients with endoscopic response and mucosal healing was 54.1% and 17.6%, respectively. Patients who developed pouchitis symptoms less than 1 year after undergoing IPAA were less likely to respond to vedolizumab, even after controlling for other risk factors. Conclusions: Vedolizumab is safe and effective in the management of CD of the pouch and chronic pouchitis. Further studies are needed to compare vedolizumab with other biologic therapies for pouchitis and CD of the pouch.
AB - Background and Aims: Inflammation of the pouch after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) can significantly impact quality of life and be difficult to treat. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch and chronic antibiotic-dependent or antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study at 5 academic referral centers in the United States. Adult patients with endoscopic inflammation of the pouch who received vedolizumab were included. The primary outcome was clinical response at any time point. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission, endoscopic response, and remission. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed for the effect of the following variables on clinical response: fistula, onset of pouchitis less than 1 year after IPAA, younger than 35 years old, gender, previous tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-alpha use, and BMI >30. Results: Eighty-three patients were treated with vedolizumab for inflammation of the pouch between January 2014 and October 2017. Median follow-up was 1.3 years (interquartile range 0.7-2.1). The proportion of patients that achieved at least a clinical response was 71.1%, with 19.3% achieving clinical remission. Of the 74 patients with a follow-up pouchoscopy, the proportion of patients with endoscopic response and mucosal healing was 54.1% and 17.6%, respectively. Patients who developed pouchitis symptoms less than 1 year after undergoing IPAA were less likely to respond to vedolizumab, even after controlling for other risk factors. Conclusions: Vedolizumab is safe and effective in the management of CD of the pouch and chronic pouchitis. Further studies are needed to compare vedolizumab with other biologic therapies for pouchitis and CD of the pouch.
KW - Crohn's disease
KW - pouchitis
KW - vedolizumab
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071604896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071604896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ibd/izz030
DO - 10.1093/ibd/izz030
M3 - Article
C2 - 30810748
AN - SCOPUS:85071604896
SN - 1078-0998
VL - 25
SP - 1569
EP - 1576
JO - Inflammatory bowel diseases
JF - Inflammatory bowel diseases
IS - 9
ER -