Efficacy of Electrical Stimulators for Bone Healing: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Sham-Controlled Trials

Ilyas S. Aleem, Idris Aleem, Nathan Evaniew, Jason W. Busse, Michael Yaszemski, Arnav Agarwal, Thomas Einhorn, Mohit Bhandari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations


Electrical stimulation is a common adjunct used to promote bone healing; its efficacy, however, remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-Analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials to establish the efficacy of electrical stimulation for bone healing. We identified all trials randomizing patients to electrical or sham stimulation for bone healing. Outcomes were pain relief, functional improvement, and radiographic nonunion. Two reviewers assessed eligibility and risk of bias, performed data extraction, and rated the quality of the evidence. Fifteen trials met our inclusion criteria. Moderate quality evidence from 4 trials found that stimulation produced a significant improvement in pain (mean difference (MD) on 100-millimeter visual analogue scale = â '7.7 mm; 95% CI â '13.92 to â '1.43; p = 0.02). Two trials found no difference in functional outcome (MD = â '0.88; 95% CI â '6.63 to 4.87; p = 0.76). Moderate quality evidence from 15 trials found that stimulation reduced radiographic nonunion rates by 35% (95% CI 19% to 47%; number needed to treat = 7; p < 0.01). Patients treated with electrical stimulation as an adjunct for bone healing have less pain and are at reduced risk for radiographic nonunion; functional outcome data are limited and requires increased focus in future trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number31724
JournalScientific reports
StatePublished - Aug 19 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General


Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of Electrical Stimulators for Bone Healing: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Sham-Controlled Trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this