TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of freeze-thaw on the biomechanical and structural properties of the rat Achilles tendon
AU - Quirk, N. P.
AU - Lopez De Padilla, C.
AU - De La Vega, R. E.
AU - Coenen, M. J.
AU - Tovar, A.
AU - Evans, C. H.
AU - Müller, S. A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Authors acknowledge Andrew Thoreson, Lawrence Berglund and the materials and structural testing resource laboratory (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA) for biomechanical testing assistance and Scott I. Gamb for TEM assistance., This project was funded by the Mayo Clinic Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Rochester, MN, USA., All authors contributed to study design and manuscript development. NPQ/MJC/SAM contributed to biomechanical testing, CLP/REDLV/AT/CHE/SAM contributed to histology and image analysis. NPQ/SAM contributed to statistical analysis.
Funding Information:
This project was funded by the Mayo Clinic Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Rochester, MN, USA.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/11/16
Y1 - 2018/11/16
N2 - Rodent models are commonly used to investigate tendon healing, with the biomechanical and structural properties of the healed tendons being important outcome measures. Tendon storage for later testing becomes necessary when performing large experiments with multiple time-points. However, it is unclear whether freezing rodent tendons affects their material properties. Thus the aim of this study was to determine whether freezing rat Achilles tendons affects their biomechanical or structural properties. Tendons were frozen at either −20 °C or −80 °C directly after harvesting, or tested when freshly harvested. Groups of tendons were subjected to several freeze-thaw cycles (1, 2, and 5) within 3 months, or frozen for 9 months, after which the tendons were subjected to biomechanical testing. Additionally, fresh and thawed tendons were compared morphologically, histologically and by transmission electron microscopy. No major differences in biomechanical properties were found between fresh tendons and those frozen once or twice at −20 °C or −80 °C. However, deterioration of tendon properties was found for 5-cycle groups and both long-term freezing groups; after 9 months of freezing at −80 °C the tear resistance of the tendon was reduced from 125.4 ± 16.4N to 74.3 ± 18.4N (p = 0.0132). Moreover, tendons stored under these conditions showed major disruption of collagen fibrils when examined by transmission electron microscopy. When examined histologically, fresh samples exhibited the best cellularity and proteoglycan content of the enthesis. These properties were preserved better after freezing at −80 °C than after freezing at −20 °C, which resulted in markedly smaller chondrocytes and less proteoglycan content. Overall, the best preservation of histological integrity was seen with tendons frozen once at −80 °C. In conclusion, rat Achilles tendons can be frozen once or twice for short periods of time (up to 3 months) at −20 °C or −80 °C for later testing. However, freezing for 9 months at either −20 °C or −80 °C leads to deterioration of certain parameters.
AB - Rodent models are commonly used to investigate tendon healing, with the biomechanical and structural properties of the healed tendons being important outcome measures. Tendon storage for later testing becomes necessary when performing large experiments with multiple time-points. However, it is unclear whether freezing rodent tendons affects their material properties. Thus the aim of this study was to determine whether freezing rat Achilles tendons affects their biomechanical or structural properties. Tendons were frozen at either −20 °C or −80 °C directly after harvesting, or tested when freshly harvested. Groups of tendons were subjected to several freeze-thaw cycles (1, 2, and 5) within 3 months, or frozen for 9 months, after which the tendons were subjected to biomechanical testing. Additionally, fresh and thawed tendons were compared morphologically, histologically and by transmission electron microscopy. No major differences in biomechanical properties were found between fresh tendons and those frozen once or twice at −20 °C or −80 °C. However, deterioration of tendon properties was found for 5-cycle groups and both long-term freezing groups; after 9 months of freezing at −80 °C the tear resistance of the tendon was reduced from 125.4 ± 16.4N to 74.3 ± 18.4N (p = 0.0132). Moreover, tendons stored under these conditions showed major disruption of collagen fibrils when examined by transmission electron microscopy. When examined histologically, fresh samples exhibited the best cellularity and proteoglycan content of the enthesis. These properties were preserved better after freezing at −80 °C than after freezing at −20 °C, which resulted in markedly smaller chondrocytes and less proteoglycan content. Overall, the best preservation of histological integrity was seen with tendons frozen once at −80 °C. In conclusion, rat Achilles tendons can be frozen once or twice for short periods of time (up to 3 months) at −20 °C or −80 °C for later testing. However, freezing for 9 months at either −20 °C or −80 °C leads to deterioration of certain parameters.
KW - Biomechanical testing
KW - Freeze-thaw
KW - Histology
KW - Rat Achilles tendon
KW - Ultra-structure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054160765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054160765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.09.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.09.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 30293824
AN - SCOPUS:85054160765
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 81
SP - 52
EP - 57
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
ER -