TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Graft Thickness on Visual Acuity after Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Wacker, Katrin
AU - Bourne, William M.
AU - Patel, Sanjay V.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/Support: Publication of this article was supported by funding from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, New York (unrestricted grant to the Department of Ophthalmology and support to Sanjay V. Patel as Olga Keith Wiess Special Scholar); Dr Werner Jackstaedt Foundation, Wuppertal, Germany (Research Fellowship to Katrin Wacker); and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota. Financial disclosure: Katrin Wacker: Research fellowship (grant) from the Dr Werner Jackstaedt Foundation, Wuppertal, Germany. Sanjay V. Patel: Research grants from Research to Prevent Blindness (unrestricted departmental grant and Olga Keith Wiess Special Scholar Award) and National Institutes of Health (U01 EY 20797, Effect of Corneal Preservation Time on Long-Term Graft Success Cornea Preservation Time Study (CPTS); and R21 EY 25071, The role of transcription factor 4 repeat expansion in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy). The following author has no financial disclosures: William M. Bourne. All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for authorship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Purpose To assess the relationship between graft thickness and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and conference abstracts were searched for studies published up to October 2015 with standard systematic review methodology. Eligibility criteria included studies evaluating graft thickness in primary DSEK and visual outcomes. There were no restrictions to study design, study population, or language. Correlation coefficients were pooled using random-effects models. Results Of 480 articles and conference abstracts, 31 met inclusion criteria (2214 eyes) after full-text review. Twenty-three studies assessed correlations between BCVA and graft thickness, and 8 studies used different statistical methods. All associations were reported dimensionless. Studies generally had small sample sizes and were heterogeneous, especially with respect to data and analysis quality (P =.02). Most studies did not measure BCVA in a standardized manner. The pooled correlation coefficient for graft thickness vs BCVA was 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14-0.26) for 17 studies without data concerns; this did not include 7 studies (815 eyes) that used different statistical methods and did not find significant associations. Conclusions There is insufficient evidence that graft thickness is clinically important with respect to BCVA after DSEK, with meta-analysis suggesting a weak relationship. Although well-designed longitudinal studies with standardized measurements of visual acuity and graft thickness are necessary to better characterize this relationship, current evidence suggests that graft thickness is not important for surgical planning.
AB - Purpose To assess the relationship between graft thickness and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and conference abstracts were searched for studies published up to October 2015 with standard systematic review methodology. Eligibility criteria included studies evaluating graft thickness in primary DSEK and visual outcomes. There were no restrictions to study design, study population, or language. Correlation coefficients were pooled using random-effects models. Results Of 480 articles and conference abstracts, 31 met inclusion criteria (2214 eyes) after full-text review. Twenty-three studies assessed correlations between BCVA and graft thickness, and 8 studies used different statistical methods. All associations were reported dimensionless. Studies generally had small sample sizes and were heterogeneous, especially with respect to data and analysis quality (P =.02). Most studies did not measure BCVA in a standardized manner. The pooled correlation coefficient for graft thickness vs BCVA was 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14-0.26) for 17 studies without data concerns; this did not include 7 studies (815 eyes) that used different statistical methods and did not find significant associations. Conclusions There is insufficient evidence that graft thickness is clinically important with respect to BCVA after DSEK, with meta-analysis suggesting a weak relationship. Although well-designed longitudinal studies with standardized measurements of visual acuity and graft thickness are necessary to better characterize this relationship, current evidence suggests that graft thickness is not important for surgical planning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959333070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959333070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.12.015
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.12.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 26707032
AN - SCOPUS:84959333070
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 163
SP - 18
EP - 28
JO - American journal of ophthalmology
JF - American journal of ophthalmology
ER -