Early outcomes of primary pediatric keratoplasty in patients with acquired, atraumatic corneal pathology

Sunil Ganekal, Chandrashekar Gangangouda, Syril Dorairaj, Vishal Jhanji

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the early outcomes of pediatric corneal transplantation in patients with acquired, nontraumatic corneal pathology. Methods: In this retrospective series, the records of children 15 years of age or younger who underwent optical penetrating keratoplasty for acquired nontraumatic corneal pathologies between December 2008 and June 2010 were reviewed. Demographic features, etiology of opacification, visual acuity, and other clinical findings were recorded. Results: Nineteen eyes of 19 children (10 females) were included. Mean age at time of surgery was 9.1 ± 3.01 years (range, 5-15 years). Adherent leukoma secondary to healed infectious keratitis (n = 12, 63%) and keratoconus (n = 7, 37%) were the leading indications for surgery. The mean follow-up period was 10.2 ± 3.3 months (range, 6-18 months). Postoperatively, clear grafts were seen in 15 cases (79%). Graft failure was noted in 4 eyes secondary to allograft rejection (n = 1), graft infection (n = 1), primary graft failure (n = 1), and uncontrolled glaucoma (n = 1). The most common cause of moderate or poor visual outcome was amblyopia (80%). Overall, 13 patients (68%) had postoperative visual acuity better than the preoperative vision. Conclusions: Penetrating keratoplasty can yield good anatomic results in children with acquired, nontraumatic causes of corneal scarring, but amblyopia limits the visual outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-355
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of AAPOS
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early outcomes of primary pediatric keratoplasty in patients with acquired, atraumatic corneal pathology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this