TY - JOUR
T1 - Drivers of Thyroid Ultrasound Use
T2 - A Retrospective Observational Study
AU - Soto Jacome, Cristian
AU - Segura Torres, Danny
AU - Fan, Jungwei W.
AU - Garcia-Bautista, Andrea
AU - Golembiewski, Elizabeth
AU - Duran, Mayra
AU - Loor-Torres, Ricardo
AU - Toro-Tobon, David
AU - Singh Ospina, Naykky
AU - Brito, Juan P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 AACE
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Objective: Excessive use of thyroid ultrasound (TUS) contributes to the overdiagnosis of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. In this study, we evaluated drivers of and clinical trajectories following TUS orders. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 500 adult patients who underwent an initial TUS between 2015 and 2017 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. A framework was employed to classify the indication for TUS, and it was characterized as inappropriate when ordered without a guideline-based indication. Medical records were reviewed for up to 12 months following the TUS, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: The mean age mean age (SD) was 53.6 years (16.6), 63.8% female, and 86.6% white. TUS orders were triggered by incidental findings on unrelated imaging (31.6%), thyroid symptoms (20.4%), thyroid abnormalities on routine physical examination (17.2%), and thyroid dysfunction workup (11.8%). In females and males, the most common reason were incidental findings on imaging (female, 91/319, 28.5% and male, 67/181, 37.0%). In primary care practice, TUS orders were mostly triggered by symptoms (71/218, 32.5%), while thyroid dysfunction workup was the primary reason in endocrinology (28/100, 28.0%). We classified 11.2% (56/500) TUS orders as likely to have been ordered inappropriately based on current guidelines. Finally, 119 patients (119/500, 23.8%) had a thyroid biopsy with 11.8% had thyroid cancer (14/119. 11.8%). Conclusions: Incidental findings on imaging, symptoms, and routine physical exam findings in asymptomatic patients were the most prevalent drivers of TUS. Furthermore, 1 in 10 TUS were likely inappropriately ordered based on current practice guidelines.
AB - Objective: Excessive use of thyroid ultrasound (TUS) contributes to the overdiagnosis of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. In this study, we evaluated drivers of and clinical trajectories following TUS orders. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 500 adult patients who underwent an initial TUS between 2015 and 2017 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. A framework was employed to classify the indication for TUS, and it was characterized as inappropriate when ordered without a guideline-based indication. Medical records were reviewed for up to 12 months following the TUS, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: The mean age mean age (SD) was 53.6 years (16.6), 63.8% female, and 86.6% white. TUS orders were triggered by incidental findings on unrelated imaging (31.6%), thyroid symptoms (20.4%), thyroid abnormalities on routine physical examination (17.2%), and thyroid dysfunction workup (11.8%). In females and males, the most common reason were incidental findings on imaging (female, 91/319, 28.5% and male, 67/181, 37.0%). In primary care practice, TUS orders were mostly triggered by symptoms (71/218, 32.5%), while thyroid dysfunction workup was the primary reason in endocrinology (28/100, 28.0%). We classified 11.2% (56/500) TUS orders as likely to have been ordered inappropriately based on current guidelines. Finally, 119 patients (119/500, 23.8%) had a thyroid biopsy with 11.8% had thyroid cancer (14/119. 11.8%). Conclusions: Incidental findings on imaging, symptoms, and routine physical exam findings in asymptomatic patients were the most prevalent drivers of TUS. Furthermore, 1 in 10 TUS were likely inappropriately ordered based on current practice guidelines.
KW - Thyroid nodule
KW - inappropriate ultrasound
KW - overdiagnosis
KW - thyroid cancer
KW - triggers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173339283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85173339283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.09.006
DO - 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.09.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 37722595
AN - SCOPUS:85173339283
SN - 1530-891X
VL - 29
SP - 948
EP - 954
JO - Endocrine Practice
JF - Endocrine Practice
IS - 12
ER -