TY - JOUR
T1 - “Direct to Drug” screening as a precision medicine tool in multiple myeloma
AU - Bonolo de Campos, Cecilia
AU - Meurice, Nathalie
AU - Petit, Joachim L.
AU - Polito, Alysia N.
AU - Zhu, Yuan Xiao
AU - Wang, Panwen
AU - Bruins, Laura A.
AU - Wang, Xuewei
AU - Lopez Armenta, Ilsel D.
AU - Darvish, Susie A.
AU - Ahmann, Greg J.
AU - Henderson, Kimberly J.
AU - Tian, Shulan
AU - Kruse, Jonas J.
AU - Stewart, William M.
AU - Larsen, Jeremy T.
AU - Reeder, Craig B.
AU - Dingli, David
AU - Kapoor, Prashant
AU - Kumar, Shaji K.
AU - Fonseca, Rafael
AU - Bergsagel, P. Leif
AU - Braggio, Esteban
AU - Stewart, A. Keith
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the patients who consented to the study. N.M. thanks Dr. Brian Van Ness for constructive feedback on the manuscript and figures, Dr. Gerald M. Maggiora for fruitful discussions on pattern recognition and similarity, as well as Drs. Linda B. Baughn and Dragan Jevremovic for guidance on clinical stratification of patients. This study was supported by a Senior Research Grant from the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) as well as the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U54CA224018 to AKS. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Seventy-six FDA-approved oncology drugs and emerging therapeutics were evaluated in 25 multiple myeloma (MM) and 15 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma cell lines and in 113 primary MM samples. Ex vivo drug sensitivities were mined for associations with clinical phenotype, cytogenetic, genetic mutation, and transcriptional profiles. In primary MM samples, proteasome inhibitors, dinaciclib, selinexor, venetoclax, auranofin, and histone deacetylating agents had the broadest cytotoxicity. Of interest, newly diagnosed patient samples were globally less sensitive especially to bromodomain inhibitors, inhibitors of receptor tyrosine kinases or non-receptor kinases, and DNA synthesis inhibitors. Clustering demonstrated six broad groupings of drug sensitivity linked with genomic biomarkers and clinical outcomes. For example, our findings mimic clinical observations of increased venetoclax responsiveness in t(11;14) patients but also identify an increased sensitivity profile in untreated patients, standard genetic risk, low plasma cell S-Phase, and in the absence of Gain(1q) and t(4;14). In contrast, increased ex vivo responsiveness to selinexor was associated with biomarkers of poor prognosis and later relapse patients. This “direct to drug” screening resource, paired with functional genomics, has the potential to successfully direct appropriate individualized therapeutic approaches in MM and to enrich clinical trials for likely responders.
AB - Seventy-six FDA-approved oncology drugs and emerging therapeutics were evaluated in 25 multiple myeloma (MM) and 15 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma cell lines and in 113 primary MM samples. Ex vivo drug sensitivities were mined for associations with clinical phenotype, cytogenetic, genetic mutation, and transcriptional profiles. In primary MM samples, proteasome inhibitors, dinaciclib, selinexor, venetoclax, auranofin, and histone deacetylating agents had the broadest cytotoxicity. Of interest, newly diagnosed patient samples were globally less sensitive especially to bromodomain inhibitors, inhibitors of receptor tyrosine kinases or non-receptor kinases, and DNA synthesis inhibitors. Clustering demonstrated six broad groupings of drug sensitivity linked with genomic biomarkers and clinical outcomes. For example, our findings mimic clinical observations of increased venetoclax responsiveness in t(11;14) patients but also identify an increased sensitivity profile in untreated patients, standard genetic risk, low plasma cell S-Phase, and in the absence of Gain(1q) and t(4;14). In contrast, increased ex vivo responsiveness to selinexor was associated with biomarkers of poor prognosis and later relapse patients. This “direct to drug” screening resource, paired with functional genomics, has the potential to successfully direct appropriate individualized therapeutic approaches in MM and to enrich clinical trials for likely responders.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084470472&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084470472&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41408-020-0320-7
DO - 10.1038/s41408-020-0320-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 32393731
AN - SCOPUS:85084470472
SN - 2044-5385
VL - 10
JO - Blood cancer journal
JF - Blood cancer journal
IS - 5
M1 - 54
ER -