Diagnostic diversity – an indicator of institutional and regional healthcare quality

Brutsche Martin, Rassouli Frank, Gallion Harald, Kalra Sanjay, L. Roger Veronique, Baty Florent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


AIM: Our aim was to estimate the diagnostic performance of institutions and healthcare regions from a nationwide hospitalisation database. METHODS: The Shannon diversity index was used as an indicator of diagnostic performance based on the International Classification of Disease, 10th revision, German Modification (ICD-10-GM codes). The dataset included a total of 9,325,326 hospitalisation cases from 2009 to 2015 and was provided by the Swiss Federal Office for Statistics. A total of 16,435 diagnostic items from the ICD-10-GM codes were taken as the basis for the calculation of the diagnostic diversity index (DDI). Numerical simulations were performed to evaluate the effect of misdiagnoses in the DDI. We arbitrarily defined the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) as 10% misdiagnoses. The R statistical software was used for all analyses. RESULTS: Diagnostic performance of institutions and healthcare regions as measured by the DDI were strongly associated with caseload and number of inhabitants, respectively. A caseload of >7217 hospitalisations per year for institutions and a population size >363,522 for healthcare regions were indicators of an acceptable diagnostic performance. Among hospitals, there was notable heterogeneity of diagnostic diversity, which was strongly associated with caseload. Application of misdiagnosis-thresholds within each ICD-10-GM category allowed classification of hospitals in four distinct groups: high-volume hospitals with an all-over comprehensive diagnostic performance; high- to mid-volume hospitals with extensive to relevant basic diagnostic performance in most categories; low-volume specialised hospitals with a high diagnostic performance in a single category; and low-volume hospitals with inadequate diagnostic performance in all categories. The diagnostic diversity observed in the 26 Swiss healthcare regions showed relevant heterogeneity, an association with ICD-10-GM code utilisation, and was strongly associated with the size of the healthcare region. The limited diagnostic performance in small healthcare regions was partially, but not fully, compensated for by consumption of health services outside of their own healthcare region. CONCLUSION: Calculation of the DDI from ICD-10 codes is easy and complements the information derived from other quality indicators as it sheds a light on the fitness of the institutionalised interplay between primary and specialised medical inpatient care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSwiss medical weekly
Issue number49-50
StatePublished - Dec 15 2018


  • Healthcare quality
  • International Classification of Diseases
  • Shannon diversity index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic diversity – an indicator of institutional and regional healthcare quality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this