Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?

Lesley F. Degner, Jeffrey A. Sloan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

800 Scopus citations


Two surveys were conducted to determine what roles people actually want to assume in selecting cancer treatments. 436 newly diagnosed cancer patients and 482 members of the general public participated. Preferences were elicited using two card sort procedures, each of which described five potential roles in decision making. Findings suggested that the impact of being diagnosed with a life-threatening illness may influence preferences to participate. The majority (59%) of patients wanted physicians to make treatment decisions on their behalf, but 64% of the public thought they would want to select their own treatment if they developed cancer. Most patients (51%) and members of the public (46%) wanted their physician and family to share responsibility for decision making if they were too ill to participate. Sociodemographic variables accounted for only 15% of variance in preferences. These variables are not particularly useful in making predictions about which groups want more or less active roles in medical decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)941-950
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1992


  • Decision making
  • Medical oncology
  • Neoplasms
  • Patient advocacy
  • Patient participation
  • Social psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology


Dive into the research topics of 'Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this