Cytogenetic abnormalities in essential thrombocythemia: Clinical and molecular correlates and prognostic relevance in 809 informative cases

Naseema Gangat, Yamna Jadoon, Natasha Szuber, Curtis A. Hanson, Alexandra P. Wolanskyj-Spinner, Rhett P. Ketterling, Animesh Pardanani, Ayalew Tefferi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Cytogenetic studies among 809 consecutive patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET; median age 59 years; 65% females) revealed normal karyotype in 754 (93%), loss of chromosome Y only (-Y) in 16 (2%), and abnormalities other than -Y in 39 (4.8%), the most frequent being sole 20q- (n = 8). At presentation, abnormal karyotype, excluding -Y, was associated with older age (p = 0.04), higher leukocyte count (p = 0.03) and arterial thrombosis history (p = 0.02); no associations were apparent for JAK2/CALR/MPL mutations whereas ASXL1 mutations clustered with normal karyotype/-Y and TP53 with abnormal karyotype. Survival was significantly shorter in patients with abnormal karyotype or -Y, compared to those with normal karyotype (median 12, 10, and 21 years, respectively; p < 0.0001). During multivariable analysis that included IPSET (international prognostic score for ET) variables, abnormal karyotype (p < 0.01, HR 2.0), age >60 years (p < 0.01, HR 4.5), leukocytosis >11 × 109/L (p < 0.01, HR 1.5), and male gender (p < 0.01, HR 1.4) were independently associated with inferior survival; abnormal karyotype and age >60 years remained significant, along with SF3B1/SRSF2/U2AF1/TP53 mutations (p = 0.04; HR 2.9), when the latter was included in the multivariable model. The current study suggests prognostic relevance for karyotype in ET.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number44
JournalBlood cancer journal
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cytogenetic abnormalities in essential thrombocythemia: Clinical and molecular correlates and prognostic relevance in 809 informative cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this