COUNTERPOINT: Should the New Definition of PH Be the Clinical Practice Standard? No

Robert P. Frantz

doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.018

COUNTERPOINT: Should the New Definition of PH Be the Clinical Practice Standard? No

Robert P. Frantz

Cardiovascular Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	766-768
Number of pages	3
Journal	Chest
Volume	157
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.018
State	Published - Apr 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.018

Cite this

@article{cf5cb77eac124060a95439b1e1683c55,

title = "COUNTERPOINT: Should the New Definition of PH Be the Clinical Practice Standard? No",

author = "Frantz, {Robert P.}",

year = "2020",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.018",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "157",

pages = "766--768",

journal = "Chest",

issn = "0012-3692",

publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - COUNTERPOINT

T2 - Should the New Definition of PH Be the Clinical Practice Standard? No

AU - Frantz, Robert P.

PY - 2020/4

Y1 - 2020/4

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082137596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082137596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.018

DO - 10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.018

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 32252926

AN - SCOPUS:85082137596

SN - 0012-3692

VL - 157

SP - 766

EP - 768

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

IS - 4

ER -

COUNTERPOINT: Should the New Definition of PH Be the Clinical Practice Standard? No

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this