Consensus statement on the processing, interpretation and reporting of temporal artery biopsy for arteritis

Vidhya Nair, Gregory A. Fishbein, Robert Padera, Michael A. Seidman, Mathieu Castonguay, Charles Leduc, Carmela D. Tan, E. Rene Rodriguez, Joseph J. Maleszewski, Dylan Miller, Maria Romero, Jon Lomasney, Giulia d'Amati, Monica De Gaspari, Stefania Rizzo, Annalisa Angelini, Cristina Basso, Silvio Litovsky, Louis Maximilian Buja, James R. StoneJohn P. Veinot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common systemic vasculitis in adults in Europe and North America, typically involving the extra-cranial branches of the carotid arteries and the thoracic aorta. Despite advances in noninvasive imaging, temporal artery biopsy (TAB) remains the gold standard for establishing a GCA diagnosis. The processing of TAB depends largely on individual institutional protocol, and the interpretation and reporting practices vary among pathologists. To address this lack of uniformity, the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology formed a committee tasked with establishing consensus guidelines for the processing, interpretation, and reporting of TAB specimens, based on the existing literature. This consensus statement includes a discussion of the differential diagnoses including other forms of arteritis and noninflammatory changes of the temporal artery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number107574
JournalCardiovascular Pathology
Volume67
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2023

Keywords

  • Active arteritis
  • Giant cell arteritis
  • Healed arteritis
  • Healing arterial injury
  • Temporal arteritis
  • Temporal artery biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus statement on the processing, interpretation and reporting of temporal artery biopsy for arteritis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this