TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical utility of testing AQP4-IgG in CSF
T2 - Guidance for physicians
AU - Majed, Masoud
AU - Fryer, James P.
AU - McKeon, Andrew
AU - Lennon, Vanda A.
AU - Pittock, Sean J.
N1 - Funding Information:
M. Majed and J. Fryer reports no disclosures. A. McKeon received research support from Medimmune, Inc. V.A. Lennon receives royalties from RSR/Kronus for sale of aquaporin-4 autoantibody testing kits and for commercial aquaporin-4 autoantibody testing performed outside Mayo Clinic, received research support from NIH, received license fee payments for RSR/Kronus for sale of aquaporin-4 autoantibody testing kits, non-Mayo sites performing “home brew” diagnostic testing for aquaporin-4 autoantibody, and has a potential financial interest in “Aquaporin-4 as an aid for cancer diagnosis.” S.J. Pittock consulted for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Medimmune, and Chugai Pharma USA; received research support from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation, S.J. Pittock, and Mayo Clinic; and has a financial interest in patents that relate to functional AQP4/NMO-IgG assays and NMO-IgG as a cancer marker. Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosure forms.
Funding Information:
Funding provided by the Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation and the NIH (NS065829).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Academy of Neurology.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Objective: To define, using assays of optimized sensitivity and specificity, the most informative specimen type for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) detection. Methods: Results were reviewed from longitudinal service testing for AQP4-IgG among specimens submitted to the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory from 101, 065 individual patients. Paired samples of serum/CSF were tested from 616 patients, using M1-AQP4- transfected cell-based assays (both fixed AQP4-CBA Euroimmun kit [commercial CBA] and live in-house flow cytometry [FACS]). Sensitivities were compared for 58 time-matched paired specimens (drawn ≤30 days apart) from patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or high-risk patients. Results: The frequency of CSF submission as sole initial specimen was 1 in 50 in 2007 and 1 in 5 in 2015. In no case among 616 paired specimens was CSF positive and serum negative. In 58 time-matched paired specimens, AQP4-IgG was detected by FACS or by commercial CBA more sensitively in serum than in CSF (respectively, p = 0.06 and p < 0.001). A serum titer .1:100 predicted CSF positivity (p < 0.001). The probability of CSF positivity was greater around attack time (p = 0.03). No control specimen from 128 neurologic patients was positive by either assay. Conclusions: FACS and commercial CBA detection of AQP4-IgG is less sensitive in CSF than in serum. The data suggest that most AQP4-IgG is produced in peripheral lymphoid tissues and that a critical serum/CSF gradient is required for IgG to penetrate the CNS in pathogenic quantity. Serum is the optimal and most cost-effective specimen for AQP4-IgG testing. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with NMO or NMOSD, CSF is less sensitive than serum for detection of AQP4-IgG.
AB - Objective: To define, using assays of optimized sensitivity and specificity, the most informative specimen type for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) detection. Methods: Results were reviewed from longitudinal service testing for AQP4-IgG among specimens submitted to the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory from 101, 065 individual patients. Paired samples of serum/CSF were tested from 616 patients, using M1-AQP4- transfected cell-based assays (both fixed AQP4-CBA Euroimmun kit [commercial CBA] and live in-house flow cytometry [FACS]). Sensitivities were compared for 58 time-matched paired specimens (drawn ≤30 days apart) from patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or high-risk patients. Results: The frequency of CSF submission as sole initial specimen was 1 in 50 in 2007 and 1 in 5 in 2015. In no case among 616 paired specimens was CSF positive and serum negative. In 58 time-matched paired specimens, AQP4-IgG was detected by FACS or by commercial CBA more sensitively in serum than in CSF (respectively, p = 0.06 and p < 0.001). A serum titer .1:100 predicted CSF positivity (p < 0.001). The probability of CSF positivity was greater around attack time (p = 0.03). No control specimen from 128 neurologic patients was positive by either assay. Conclusions: FACS and commercial CBA detection of AQP4-IgG is less sensitive in CSF than in serum. The data suggest that most AQP4-IgG is produced in peripheral lymphoid tissues and that a critical serum/CSF gradient is required for IgG to penetrate the CNS in pathogenic quantity. Serum is the optimal and most cost-effective specimen for AQP4-IgG testing. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with NMO or NMOSD, CSF is less sensitive than serum for detection of AQP4-IgG.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996870060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996870060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000231
DO - 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000231
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84996870060
SN - 2332-7812
VL - 3
JO - Neurology: Neuroimmunology and NeuroInflammation
JF - Neurology: Neuroimmunology and NeuroInflammation
IS - 3
M1 - e231
ER -