TY - JOUR
T1 - Case-Based Review and Clinical Guidance on the Use of Genomic Assays for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
T2 - Breast Cancer Therapy Expert Group (BCTEG)
AU - Kittaneh, Muaiad
AU - Badve, Sunil
AU - Caldera, Humberto
AU - Coleman, Robert
AU - Goetz, Matthew P.
AU - Mahtani, Reshma
AU - Mamounas, Eleftherios
AU - Kalinsky, Kevin
AU - Lower, Elyse
AU - Pegram, Mark
AU - Press, Michael F.
AU - Rugo, Hope S.
AU - Schwartzberg, Lee
AU - Traina, Tiffany
AU - Vogel, Charles
N1 - Funding Information:
An unrestricted educational grant for this activity was provided by Agendia, Inc, BioTheranostics, Inc, Myriad, Inc, and Nanostring, Inc. The faculty members of the BCTEG were compensated for their participation by Total Health Information Services, a medical information company. Independent medical writing support was provided by SciavoTECH Research and Consultancy Services, Inc and funded by Total Health Conferencing.
Funding Information:
An unrestricted educational grant for this activity was provided by Agendia, Inc , BioTheranostics, Inc , Myriad, Inc , and Nanostring, Inc . The faculty members of the BCTEG were compensated for their participation by Total Health Information Services, a medical information company. Independent medical writing support was provided by SciavoTECH Research and Consultancy Services, Inc and funded by Total Health Conferencing .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - In addition to classical clinicopathologic factors, such as hormone receptor positivity, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, and tumor size, grade, and lymph node status, a number of commercially available genomic tests may be used to help inform treatment decisions for early breast cancer patients. Although these tests improve our understanding of breast cancer and help to individualize treatment decisions, clinicians face challenges when deciding on the most appropriate test to order, and the advantages, if any, of one test over another. The Breast Cancer Therapy Expert Group (BCTEG) recently convened a roundtable meeting to discuss issues surrounding the use of genomic testing in early breast cancer, with the goal of providing practical guidance on the use of these tests by the community oncologist, for whom breast cancer may be only one of many tumor types they treat. The group recognizes that genomic testing can provide important prognostic (eg, risk for recurrence), and in some cases predictive, information (eg, benefit of chemotherapy, or extended adjuvant endocrine therapy), which can be used to help guide treatment decisions in breast cancer. The available tests differ in the types of information they provide, and in the patient populations and clinical trials that were conducted to validate them. We summarize the discussion of the BCTEG on this topic, and we also consider several patient cases and clinical scenarios in which genomic testing may, or may not, be useful to guide treatment decisions for the practicing community oncologist.
AB - In addition to classical clinicopathologic factors, such as hormone receptor positivity, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, and tumor size, grade, and lymph node status, a number of commercially available genomic tests may be used to help inform treatment decisions for early breast cancer patients. Although these tests improve our understanding of breast cancer and help to individualize treatment decisions, clinicians face challenges when deciding on the most appropriate test to order, and the advantages, if any, of one test over another. The Breast Cancer Therapy Expert Group (BCTEG) recently convened a roundtable meeting to discuss issues surrounding the use of genomic testing in early breast cancer, with the goal of providing practical guidance on the use of these tests by the community oncologist, for whom breast cancer may be only one of many tumor types they treat. The group recognizes that genomic testing can provide important prognostic (eg, risk for recurrence), and in some cases predictive, information (eg, benefit of chemotherapy, or extended adjuvant endocrine therapy), which can be used to help guide treatment decisions in breast cancer. The available tests differ in the types of information they provide, and in the patient populations and clinical trials that were conducted to validate them. We summarize the discussion of the BCTEG on this topic, and we also consider several patient cases and clinical scenarios in which genomic testing may, or may not, be useful to guide treatment decisions for the practicing community oncologist.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Extended adjuvant therapy
KW - Genomic testing
KW - Molecular profiling
KW - Recurrence risk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078731212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078731212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.01.001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32014370
AN - SCOPUS:85078731212
SN - 1526-8209
VL - 20
SP - 183
EP - 193
JO - Clinical breast cancer
JF - Clinical breast cancer
IS - 3
ER -