TY - JOUR
T1 - Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Bile Acid Diarrhea
AU - Sadowski, Daniel C.
AU - Camilleri, Michael
AU - Chey, William D.
AU - Leontiadis, Grigorios I.
AU - Marshall, John K.
AU - Shaffer, Eldon A.
AU - Tse, Frances
AU - Walters, Julian R.F.
N1 - Funding Information:
The consensus group would like to thank Pauline Lavigne and Steven Portelance (unaffiliated) who provided medical writing services and editorial assistance on their behalf, supported by funds from the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology; and Paul Sinclair , Cindy Roll , and Adria Cehovin (Canadian Association of Gastroenterology representatives: administrative and technical support, and logistical assistance). As per Canadian Association of Gastroenterology policy for all clinical practice guidelines, the manuscript was made available to all Canadian Association of Gastroenterology members for commenting before submission for publication. Members were notified that the manuscript was available on the members-only section of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology website and open for comment for a 2-week period.
Funding Information:
Funding This guideline was supported through unrestricted grants to the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology by Pendopharm and GE Healthcare Canada, neither of which had any involvement in the development of this guideline. The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology administered all aspects of the meeting, and the funding sources had no involvement in the process at any point, and were not made aware of any part of the process from the development of search strings and the statements, to drafting and approval of these guidelines.The consensus group would like to thank Pauline Lavigne and Steven Portelance (unaffiliated) who provided medical writing services and editorial assistance on their behalf, supported by funds from the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology; and Paul Sinclair, Cindy Roll, and Adria Cehovin (Canadian Association of Gastroenterology representatives: administrative and technical support, and logistical assistance). As per Canadian Association of Gastroenterology policy for all clinical practice guidelines, the manuscript was made available to all Canadian Association of Gastroenterology members for commenting before submission for publication. Members were notified that the manuscript was available on the members-only section of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology website and open for comment for a 2-week period.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 AGA Institute and the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - Background & Aims: Chronic diarrhea affects about 5% of the population overall. Altered bile acid metabolism is a common but frequently undiagnosed cause. Methods: We performed a systematic search of publication databases for studies of assessment and management of bile acid diarrhea (BAD). The certainty (quality) of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Patient population, intervention, comparator, and outcome questions were developed through an iterative process and were voted on by a group of specialists. Results: The certainty of evidence was generally rated as very low. Therefore, 16 of 17 recommendations are conditional. In patients with chronic diarrhea, consideration of risk factors (terminal ileal resection, cholecystectomy, or abdominal radiotherapy), but not additional symptoms, was recommended for identification of patients with possible BAD. The group suggested testing using 75selenium homocholic acid taurine (where available) or 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, including patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, functional diarrhea, and Crohn's disease without inflammation. Testing was suggested over empiric bile acid sequestrant therapy (BAST). Once remediable causes are managed, the group suggested cholestyramine as initial therapy, with alternate BAST when tolerability is an issue. The group suggested against BAST for patients with extensive ileal Crohn's disease or resection and suggested alternative antidiarrheal agents if BAST is not tolerated. Maintenance BAST should be given at the lowest effective dose, with a trial of intermittent, on-demand administration, concurrent medication review, and reinvestigation for patients whose symptoms persist despite BAST. Conclusions: Based on a systematic review, BAD should be considered for patients with chronic diarrhea. For patients with positive results from tests for BAD, a trial of BAST, initially with cholestyramine, is suggested.
AB - Background & Aims: Chronic diarrhea affects about 5% of the population overall. Altered bile acid metabolism is a common but frequently undiagnosed cause. Methods: We performed a systematic search of publication databases for studies of assessment and management of bile acid diarrhea (BAD). The certainty (quality) of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Patient population, intervention, comparator, and outcome questions were developed through an iterative process and were voted on by a group of specialists. Results: The certainty of evidence was generally rated as very low. Therefore, 16 of 17 recommendations are conditional. In patients with chronic diarrhea, consideration of risk factors (terminal ileal resection, cholecystectomy, or abdominal radiotherapy), but not additional symptoms, was recommended for identification of patients with possible BAD. The group suggested testing using 75selenium homocholic acid taurine (where available) or 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, including patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, functional diarrhea, and Crohn's disease without inflammation. Testing was suggested over empiric bile acid sequestrant therapy (BAST). Once remediable causes are managed, the group suggested cholestyramine as initial therapy, with alternate BAST when tolerability is an issue. The group suggested against BAST for patients with extensive ileal Crohn's disease or resection and suggested alternative antidiarrheal agents if BAST is not tolerated. Maintenance BAST should be given at the lowest effective dose, with a trial of intermittent, on-demand administration, concurrent medication review, and reinvestigation for patients whose symptoms persist despite BAST. Conclusions: Based on a systematic review, BAD should be considered for patients with chronic diarrhea. For patients with positive results from tests for BAD, a trial of BAST, initially with cholestyramine, is suggested.
KW - C4
KW - FGF19
KW - Fibroblast Growth Factor 19
KW - IBS
KW - SeHCAT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076360190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076360190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.062
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.062
M3 - Article
C2 - 31526844
AN - SCOPUS:85076360190
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 18
SP - 24-41.e1
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 1
ER -