Abstract
Background & Aims: Crohn's disease (CD) is a lifelong illness with substantial morbidity, although new therapies and treatment paradigms have been developed. We provide guidance for treatment of ambulatory patients with mild to severe active luminal CD. Methods: We performed a systematic review to identify published studies of the management of CD. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Statements were developed through an iterative online platform and then finalized and voted on by a group of specialists. Results: The consensus includes 41 statements focused on 6 main drug classes: antibiotics, 5-aminosalicylate, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, biologic therapies, and other therapies. The group suggested against the use of antibiotics or 5-aminosalicylate as induction or maintenance therapies. Corticosteroid therapies (including budesonide) can be used as induction, but not maintenance therapies. Among immunosuppressants, thiopurines should not be used for induction, but can be used for maintenance therapy for selected low-risk patients. Parenteral methotrexate was proposed for induction and maintenance therapy in patients with corticosteroid-dependent CD. Biologic agents, including tumor necrosis factor antagonists, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab, were recommended for patients failed by conventional induction therapies and as maintenance therapy. The consensus group was unable to clearly define the role of concomitant immunosuppressant therapies in initiation of treatment with a biologic agent. Conclusions: Optimal management of CD requires careful patient assessment, acknowledgement of patient preferences, evidence-based use of existing therapies, and thorough assessment to define treatment success.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1680-1713 |
Number of pages | 34 |
Journal | Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2019 |
Keywords
- 5-ASA
- Guidance
- Mucosal Healing
- TNF
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Hepatology
- Gastroenterology
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Luminal Crohn's Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol. 17, No. 9, 08.2019, p. 1680-1713.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Luminal Crohn's Disease
AU - Panaccione, Remo
AU - Steinhart, A. Hillary
AU - Bressler, B.
AU - Khanna, R.
AU - Marshall, John K.
AU - Targownik, L.
AU - Afif, Waqqas
AU - Bitton, A.
AU - Borgaonkar, Mark
AU - Chauhan, Usha
AU - Halloran, Brendan
AU - Jones, Jennifer
AU - Kennedy, Erin
AU - Leontiadis, Grigorios I.
AU - Loftus, Edward V.
AU - Meddings, Jonathan
AU - Moayyedi, Paul
AU - Murthy, Sanjay
AU - Plamondon, Sophie
AU - Rosenfeld, Greg
AU - Schwartz, D.
AU - Seow, Cynthia H.
AU - Williams, Chadwick
AU - Bernstein, Charles N.
N1 - Funding Information: Funding for the consensus meeting was provided by unrestricted, arms-length grants to the CAG by AbbVie Corp, Janssen Inc, Pfizer Canada Inc, and Takeda Canada Inc. The CAG administered all aspects of the meeting, and the funding sources had no involvement in the process at any point, and they were not made aware of any part of the process from development of search strings and the statements to drafting and approval of these guidelines. Funding Information: Funding Supported through unrestricted grants to the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology by AbbVie Corp, Janssen Inc, Pfizer Canada Inc, and Takeda Canada Inc, who had no involvement in any aspect of the guideline development. Conflicts of interest These authors disclose the following: Advisory board: AbbVie (AB, AHS, BB, BH, CB, CS, CW, GR, LT, MB, RK, RP, SM, SP, UC, WA), Abbott (RP), Actavis (AHS, BB, CS), Allergan (AB), Amgen (RP), Aptalis (RP), AstraZeneca (RP), Baxter (RP), Bristol-Myers Squibb (RP), Celgene (RP), Celltrion (BB), Centocor (RP), Cubist (CB, RP), Eisai (RP), Elan (RP), Ferring (AB, AHS, BB, CW, RP, WA), Genentech (BB, RP), Glaxo-Smith Kline (RP), Janssen (AB, AHS, BH, CS, GR, LT, RK, RP, SP, UC, WA), Merck (AB, AHS, RP), Pendopharm (AHS, BB, GR), Pfizer (AB, AHS, RP), Salix (RP), Schering-Plough (RP), Shire (AB, AHS, BB, CB, CS, CW, GR, MB, RP, SM, WA), Takeda (AB, AHS, BB, CB, CS, GR, JJ, LT, RK, RP, SM, SP, UC, WA), UCB (RP), Warner Chilcott (RP). Consulting: AbbVie (DS, GR, JJ, EL, JKM, RP), Abbott (RP), Actavis (JKM), Amgen (EL, RP), Aptalis (RP), AstraZeneca (JKM, RP), Baxter (RP), Bristol-Myers Squibb (EL, RP), Celgene (EL, RP), Celltrion (JKM), Centocor (RP), Cubist (JKM, RP), CVS Caremark (EL), Eisai (RP), Elan (RP), Eli Lilly (EL), Ferring (JKM, RP), Genentech (EL), Glaxo-Smith Kline (RP), Hospira (JKM), Janssen (DS, JJ, EL, JKM, RP), Merck (RP), Mesoblast (EL), Pfizer (AHS, EL, RP), Salix (EL), Schering-Plough (RP), Seres Therapeutics (EL), Shire (JKM, RP), Sun Pharmaceuticals (EL), Takeda (DS, JJ, EL, JKM, RP), Theradig (CB, EL), Tigenix (DS), UCB (EL, RP, DS), Warner Chilcott (RP). Educational support: AbbVie (AB, RP, SP, UC), Abbott (RP), Allergan (AB), Aptalis (UC), Bristol-Myers Squibb (RP), Centocor (RP), Elan (RP), Ferring (RP), Janssen (AB, AHS, GR, RP), Millennium (RP), Pfizer (LT), Proctor and Gamble (RP), Schering-Plough (RP), Shire (LT), Takeda (AB, LT). Research grants/clinical trial funding: AbbVie (AB, AHS, BB, EL, DS, LT, RP), Abbott (RP), Alvine (BB), Amgen (AHS, BB, EL), Boehringer Ingelheim (BB), Bristol-Myers Squibb (BB, RP), Celgene (AHS, BB, EL), Centocor (RP), Elan (RP), Ferring (RP), Genentech (AHS, BB, EL), Gilead (EL), Glaxo-Smith Kline (BB), Janssen (BB, EL, RP), MedImmune (EL), Merck (BB), Millennium (AHS, RP), Pfizer (EL, LT), Proctor and Gamble (RP), Prometheus (WA), Qu Biologic (BB), Receptos (EL), RedHill Biopharm (AHS, BB), Robarts Clinical Trials (EL), Schering-Plough (RP), Seres Therapeutics (EL), Takeda (EL), UCB (EL, DS). Speaker's bureau: AbbVie (AB, AHS, BB, BH, CB, GR, JKM, MB, RK, RP, SM, SP, UC, WA), Abbott (RP), Actavis (BB, JKM), Allergan/Forest (MB), Aptalis (UC), AstraZeneca (RP), Centocor (RP), Elan (RP), Ferring (AHS, BB, JJ, JKM), Hospira (AHS, JKM), Janssen (AHS, BH, CB, CW, GR, JJ, JKM, MB, RK, RP, SP, UC, WA), Pendopharm (BH, MB), Prometheus (RP), Schering-Plough (RP), Shire (AB, AHS, BB, BH, CB, GR, JJ, JKM, MB, RP, SP), Takeda (AB, AHS, BB, CB, CW, GR, JKM, MB, RK, RP, SM, WA), Warner Chilcott (RP). Other: Qu Biologic (BB-stock options). The remaining authors disclose no conflicts. Funding Supported through unrestricted grants to the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology by AbbVie Corp, Janssen Inc, Pfizer Canada Inc, and Takeda Canada Inc, who had no involvement in any aspect of the guideline development. The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology thanks AbbVie Corp, Janssen Inc, Pfizer Canada Inc, and Takeda Canada Inc for their generous support of the guideline process. The consensus group would like to thank the following people for their contributions: Paul Sinclair and Lesley Marshall (CAG representatives, administrative and technical support, and logistics assistance), Pauline Lavigne and Steven Portelance (unaffiliated, editorial assistance). Finally, they thank their patient advocate, Jenna Rines, for invaluable insights. Conflicts of interest These authors disclose the following: Advisory board: AbbVie (AB, AHS, BB, BH, CB, CS, CW, GR, LT, MB, RK, RP, SM, SP, UC, WA), Abbott (RP), Actavis (AHS, BB, CS), Allergan (AB), Amgen (RP), Aptalis (RP), AstraZeneca (RP), Baxter (RP), Bristol-Myers Squibb (RP), Celgene (RP), Celltrion (BB), Centocor (RP), Cubist (CB, RP), Eisai (RP), Elan (RP), Ferring (AB, AHS, BB, CW, RP, WA), Genentech (BB, RP), Glaxo-Smith Kline (RP), Janssen (AB, AHS, BH, CS, GR, LT, RK, RP, SP, UC, WA), Merck (AB, AHS, RP), Pendopharm (AHS, BB, GR), Pfizer (AB, AHS, RP), Salix (RP), Schering-Plough (RP), Shire (AB, AHS, BB, CB, CS, CW, GR, MB, RP, SM, WA), Takeda (AB, AHS, BB, CB, CS, GR, JJ, LT, RK, RP, SM, SP, UC, WA), UCB (RP), Warner Chilcott (RP). Consulting: AbbVie (DS, GR, JJ, EL, JKM, RP), Abbott (RP), Actavis (JKM), Amgen (EL, RP), Aptalis (RP), AstraZeneca (JKM, RP), Baxter (RP), Bristol-Myers Squibb (EL, RP), Celgene (EL, RP), Celltrion (JKM), Centocor (RP), Cubist (JKM, RP), CVS Caremark (EL), Eisai (RP), Elan (RP), Eli Lilly (EL), Ferring (JKM, RP), Genentech (EL), Glaxo-Smith Kline (RP), Hospira (JKM), Janssen (DS, JJ, EL, JKM, RP), Merck (RP), Mesoblast (EL), Pfizer (AHS, EL, RP), Salix (EL), Schering-Plough (RP), Seres Therapeutics (EL), Shire (JKM, RP), Sun Pharmaceuticals (EL), Takeda (DS, JJ, EL, JKM, RP), Theradig (CB, EL), Tigenix (DS), UCB (EL, RP, DS), Warner Chilcott (RP). Educational support: AbbVie (AB, RP, SP, UC), Abbott (RP), Allergan (AB), Aptalis (UC), Bristol-Myers Squibb (RP), Centocor (RP), Elan (RP), Ferring (RP), Janssen (AB, AHS, GR, RP), Millennium (RP), Pfizer (LT), Proctor and Gamble (RP), Schering-Plough (RP), Shire (LT), Takeda (AB, LT). Research grants/clinical trial funding: AbbVie (AB, AHS, BB, EL, DS, LT, RP), Abbott (RP), Alvine (BB), Amgen (AHS, BB, EL), Boehringer Ingelheim (BB), Bristol-Myers Squibb (BB, RP), Celgene (AHS, BB, EL), Centocor (RP), Elan (RP), Ferring (RP), Genentech (AHS, BB, EL), Gilead (EL), Glaxo-Smith Kline (BB), Janssen (BB, EL, RP), MedImmune (EL), Merck (BB), Millennium (AHS, RP), Pfizer (EL, LT), Proctor and Gamble (RP), Prometheus (WA), Qu Biologic (BB), Receptos (EL), RedHill Biopharm (AHS, BB), Robarts Clinical Trials (EL), Schering-Plough (RP), Seres Therapeutics (EL), Takeda (EL), UCB (EL, DS). Speaker's bureau: AbbVie (AB, AHS, BB, BH, CB, GR, JKM, MB, RK, RP, SM, SP, UC, WA), Abbott (RP), Actavis (BB, JKM), Allergan/Forest (MB), Aptalis (UC), AstraZeneca (RP), Centocor (RP), Elan (RP), Ferring (AHS, BB, JJ, JKM), Hospira (AHS, JKM), Janssen (AHS, BH, CB, CW, GR, JJ, JKM, MB, RK, RP, SP, UC, WA), Pendopharm (BH, MB), Prometheus (RP), Schering-Plough (RP), Shire (AB, AHS, BB, BH, CB, GR, JJ, JKM, MB, RP, SP), Takeda (AB, AHS, BB, CB, CW, GR, JKM, MB, RK, RP, SM, WA), Warner Chilcott (RP). Other: Qu Biologic (BB-stock options). The remaining authors disclose no conflicts. Funding Supported through unrestricted grants to the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology by AbbVie Corp, Janssen Inc, Pfizer Canada Inc, and Takeda Canada Inc, who had no involvement in any aspect of the guideline development. Funding Information: Funding Supported through unrestricted grants to the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology by AbbVie Corp, Janssen Inc, Pfizer Canada Inc, and Takeda Canada Inc, who had no involvement in any aspect of the guideline development. The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology thanks AbbVie Corp, Janssen Inc, Pfizer Canada Inc, and Takeda Canada Inc for their generous support of the guideline process. The consensus group would like to thank the following people for their contributions: Paul Sinclair and Lesley Marshall (CAG representatives, administrative and technical support, and logistics assistance), Pauline Lavigne and Steven Portelance (unaffiliated, editorial assistance). Finally, they thank their patient advocate, Jenna Rines, for invaluable insights. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 AGA Institute and the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Background & Aims: Crohn's disease (CD) is a lifelong illness with substantial morbidity, although new therapies and treatment paradigms have been developed. We provide guidance for treatment of ambulatory patients with mild to severe active luminal CD. Methods: We performed a systematic review to identify published studies of the management of CD. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Statements were developed through an iterative online platform and then finalized and voted on by a group of specialists. Results: The consensus includes 41 statements focused on 6 main drug classes: antibiotics, 5-aminosalicylate, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, biologic therapies, and other therapies. The group suggested against the use of antibiotics or 5-aminosalicylate as induction or maintenance therapies. Corticosteroid therapies (including budesonide) can be used as induction, but not maintenance therapies. Among immunosuppressants, thiopurines should not be used for induction, but can be used for maintenance therapy for selected low-risk patients. Parenteral methotrexate was proposed for induction and maintenance therapy in patients with corticosteroid-dependent CD. Biologic agents, including tumor necrosis factor antagonists, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab, were recommended for patients failed by conventional induction therapies and as maintenance therapy. The consensus group was unable to clearly define the role of concomitant immunosuppressant therapies in initiation of treatment with a biologic agent. Conclusions: Optimal management of CD requires careful patient assessment, acknowledgement of patient preferences, evidence-based use of existing therapies, and thorough assessment to define treatment success.
AB - Background & Aims: Crohn's disease (CD) is a lifelong illness with substantial morbidity, although new therapies and treatment paradigms have been developed. We provide guidance for treatment of ambulatory patients with mild to severe active luminal CD. Methods: We performed a systematic review to identify published studies of the management of CD. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Statements were developed through an iterative online platform and then finalized and voted on by a group of specialists. Results: The consensus includes 41 statements focused on 6 main drug classes: antibiotics, 5-aminosalicylate, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, biologic therapies, and other therapies. The group suggested against the use of antibiotics or 5-aminosalicylate as induction or maintenance therapies. Corticosteroid therapies (including budesonide) can be used as induction, but not maintenance therapies. Among immunosuppressants, thiopurines should not be used for induction, but can be used for maintenance therapy for selected low-risk patients. Parenteral methotrexate was proposed for induction and maintenance therapy in patients with corticosteroid-dependent CD. Biologic agents, including tumor necrosis factor antagonists, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab, were recommended for patients failed by conventional induction therapies and as maintenance therapy. The consensus group was unable to clearly define the role of concomitant immunosuppressant therapies in initiation of treatment with a biologic agent. Conclusions: Optimal management of CD requires careful patient assessment, acknowledgement of patient preferences, evidence-based use of existing therapies, and thorough assessment to define treatment success.
KW - 5-ASA
KW - Guidance
KW - Mucosal Healing
KW - TNF
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064715594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064715594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.02.043
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.02.043
M3 - Article
C2 - 30853616
AN - SCOPUS:85064715594
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 17
SP - 1680
EP - 1713
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 9
ER -