TY - JOUR
T1 - Budesonide Maintenance in Microscopic Colitis
T2 - Clinical Outcomes and Safety Profile From a Population-Based Study
AU - Tome, June
AU - Sehgal, Kanika
AU - Kamboj, Amrit K.
AU - Comstock, Bryce
AU - Harmsen, W, Scott
AU - Khanna, Sahil
AU - Pardi, Darrell S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Potential competing interests: D.S.P. has grant funding from Pfizer, Vedanta, Seres, Finch, Applied Molecular Transport, and Takeda and has consulted for Vedanta, Seres, Abbvie, Immunic, and Otsuka. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Funding Information:
Financial support: This study was made possible using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, which is supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award No. R01AG034676. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - INTRODUCTION:Outcomes and safety of budesonide maintenance therapy in microscopic colitis (MC) are not well known.METHODS:Adult residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, diagnosed with MC (2002-2019) and treated with budesonide were identified using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Response was assessed at 12 ± 4 weeks after initiation of therapy and defined as complete (resolution of diarrhea), partial (≥50% improvement in the number of bowel movements), nonresponse (<50% improvement), and intolerance (discontinued because of side effects). For safety outcomes, cases (budesonide maintenance) and MC controls (no budesonide therapy) were matched by sex and age at diagnosis (±2 years).RESULTS:A total of 450 patients were identified, of whom 162 (36.0%) were treated with budesonide for induction of clinical remission (median age 67 [23-91] years and 126 women [77.8%]). Clinical outcomes for induction were as follows: 130 (80.2%) complete response, 22 (13.6%) partial response, 8 (4.9%) no response, and 2 (1.2%) intolerance. After induction, 96 (63.2%) had recurrence after discontinuation, of whom 27 (28.1%) required further budesonide induction treatment without maintenance, 56 (58.3%) required long-term budesonide maintenance, and 13 (13.5%) were treated with other therapies. Of those receiving budesonide maintenance, all responded (55 [98.2%] complete and 1 [1.8%] partial). No patient stopped maintenance from adverse events. The median duration of follow-up was 5.6 years (0.3-18.9). There was no significant difference between cases and controls in the incidence of osteopenia/osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, glaucoma, or cataracts.DISCUSSION:The long-term use of budesonide in MC seems to be effective and generally well tolerated with limited adverse effects.
AB - INTRODUCTION:Outcomes and safety of budesonide maintenance therapy in microscopic colitis (MC) are not well known.METHODS:Adult residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, diagnosed with MC (2002-2019) and treated with budesonide were identified using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Response was assessed at 12 ± 4 weeks after initiation of therapy and defined as complete (resolution of diarrhea), partial (≥50% improvement in the number of bowel movements), nonresponse (<50% improvement), and intolerance (discontinued because of side effects). For safety outcomes, cases (budesonide maintenance) and MC controls (no budesonide therapy) were matched by sex and age at diagnosis (±2 years).RESULTS:A total of 450 patients were identified, of whom 162 (36.0%) were treated with budesonide for induction of clinical remission (median age 67 [23-91] years and 126 women [77.8%]). Clinical outcomes for induction were as follows: 130 (80.2%) complete response, 22 (13.6%) partial response, 8 (4.9%) no response, and 2 (1.2%) intolerance. After induction, 96 (63.2%) had recurrence after discontinuation, of whom 27 (28.1%) required further budesonide induction treatment without maintenance, 56 (58.3%) required long-term budesonide maintenance, and 13 (13.5%) were treated with other therapies. Of those receiving budesonide maintenance, all responded (55 [98.2%] complete and 1 [1.8%] partial). No patient stopped maintenance from adverse events. The median duration of follow-up was 5.6 years (0.3-18.9). There was no significant difference between cases and controls in the incidence of osteopenia/osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, glaucoma, or cataracts.DISCUSSION:The long-term use of budesonide in MC seems to be effective and generally well tolerated with limited adverse effects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132703611&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132703611&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001774
DO - 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001774
M3 - Article
C2 - 35417427
AN - SCOPUS:85132703611
SN - 0002-9270
VL - 117
SP - 1311
EP - 1315
JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 8
ER -