Application of the AAST EGS Grade for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction to a Multi-national Patient Population

Matthew C. Hernandez, Arianna Birindelli, John L. Bruce, Johannes J.P. Buitendag, Victory Y. Kong, Mircea Beuran, Johnathon M. Aho, Ionut Negoi, Damian L. Clarke, Salomone Di Saverio, Martin D. Zielinski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations


Background: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) anatomic severity grading system for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) has demonstrated to be a valid tool in North American patient populations. Using a multi-national patient cohort, we retrospectively assessed the validity the AAST ASBO grading system and estimated disease severity in a global population in order to correlate with several key clinical outcomes. Methods: Multicenter retrospective review during 2012–2016 from four centers, Minnesota USA, Bologna Italy, Pietermaritzburg South Africa, and Bucharest Romania, was performed. Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with ASBO were identified. Baseline demographics, physiologic parameters, laboratory results, operative and imaging details, outcomes were collected. AAST ASBO grades were assigned by independent reviewers. Univariate and multivariable analyses with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed. Results: There were 789 patients with a median [IQR] age of 58 [40–75] years; 47% were female. The AAST ASBO grades were I (n = 180, 23%), II (n = 443, 56%), III (n = 87, 11%), and IV (n = 79, 10%). Successful non-operative management was 58%. Conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy was 33%. Overall mortality and complication and temporary abdominal closure rates were 2, 46, and 4.7%, respectively. On regression, independent predictors for mortality included grade III (OR 4.4 95%CI 1.1–7.3), grade IV (OR 7.4 95%CI 1.7–9.4), pneumonia (OR 5.6 95%CI 1.4–11.3), and failing non-operative management (OR 2.4 95%CI 1.3–6.7). Conclusion: The AAST EGS grade can be assigned with ease at any surgical facility using operative or imaging findings. The AAST ASBO severity grading system has predictive validity for important clinical outcomes and allows for standardization across institutions, providers, and future research. Disease severity and outcomes varied between countries. Level of evidence III: Study type Retrospective multi-institutional cohort study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3581-3588
Number of pages8
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Application of the AAST EGS Grade for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction to a Multi-national Patient Population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this