AI IN IMAGING AND THERAPY: INNOVATIONS, ETHICS, AND IMPACT: REVIEW ARTICLE AI pitfalls and what not to do: mitigating bias in AI

Judy Wawira Gichoya, Kaesha Thomas, Leo Anthony Celi, Nabile Safdar, Imon Banerjee, John D. Banja, Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari, Hari Trivedi, Saptarshi Purkayastha

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Various forms of artificial intelligence (AI) applications are being deployed and used in many healthcare systems. As the use of these applications increases, we are learning the failures of these models and how they can perpetuate bias. With these new lessons, we need to prioritize bias evaluation and mitigation for radiology applications; all the while not ignoring the impact of changes in the larger enterprise AI deployment which may have downstream impact on performance of AI models. In this paper, we provide an updated review of known pitfalls causing AI bias and discuss strategies for mitigating these biases within the context of AI deployment in the larger healthcare enterprise. We describe these pitfalls by framing them in the larger AI lifecycle from problem definition, data set selection and curation, model training and deployment emphasizing that bias exists across a spectrum and is a sequela of a combination of both human and machine factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number20230023
JournalBritish Journal of Radiology
Volume96
Issue number1150
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'AI IN IMAGING AND THERAPY: INNOVATIONS, ETHICS, AND IMPACT: REVIEW ARTICLE AI pitfalls and what not to do: mitigating bias in AI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this