ACR appropriateness Criteria® clinically suspected adnexal mass

Robert D. Harris, Marcia C. Javitt, Phyllis Glanc, Douglas L. Brown, Theodore Dubinsky, Mukesh G. Harisinghani, Nadia J. Khati, Young Bae Kim, Donald G. Mitchell, Pari V. Pandharipande, Harpreet K. Pannu, Ann E. Podrasky, Henry D. Royal, Thomas D. Shipp, Cary Lynn Siegel, Lynn Simpson, Darci J. Wall, Jade J. Wong-You-Cheong, Carolyn M. Zelop

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations


ABSTRACT: Adnexal masses are a common problem clinically and imaging-wise, and transvaginal US (TVUS) is the first-line imaging modality for assessing them in the vast majority of patients. The findings of US, however, should be correlated with the history and laboratory tests, as well as any patient symptoms. Simple cysts are uniformly benign, and most warrant no further interrogation or treatment. Complex cysts carry more significant implications, and usually engender serial ultrasound(s), with a minority of cases warranting a pelvic MRI.Morphological analysis of adnexal masses with gray-scale US can help narrow the differential diagnosis. Spectral Doppler analysis has not proven useful in most well-performed studies. However, the use of color Doppler sonography adds significant contributions to differentiating between benign and malignant masses and is recommended in all cases of complex masses. Malignant masses generally demonstrate neovascularity, with abnormal branching vessel morphology. Optimal sonographic evaluation is achieved by using a combination of gray-scale morphologic assessment and color or power Doppler imaging to detect flow within any solid areas.The ACR Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every two years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-86
Number of pages8
JournalUltrasound Quarterly
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2013


  • adnexal masses
  • appropriateness criteria
  • color doppler sonography
  • ovarian cysts
  • ovarian malignancy
  • transvaginal ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'ACR appropriateness Criteria® clinically suspected adnexal mass'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this