TY - JOUR
T1 - A longitudinal evaluation of speech rate in primary progressive apraxia of speech
AU - Utianski, Rene L.
AU - Martin, Peter R.
AU - Hanley, Holly
AU - Duffy, Joseph R.
AU - Botha, Hugo
AU - Clark, Heather M.
AU - Whitwell, Jennifer L.
AU - Josephs, Keith A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grants R01 DC010367 (Principal Investigator [PI]: K. A. Josephs), R01 DC014942 (PI: K. A. Josephs), and R01 DC012519 (PI: J. L. Whitwell) and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant R21 NS094684 (PI: K. A. Josephs). We extend our gratitude to these patients and their families for their time and dedication to our research program.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Purpose: Individuals with primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) have apraxia of speech (AOS) in which disruptions in articulation or prosody predominate the speech pattern, referred to, respectively, as phonetic or prosodic subtypes. Many develop aphasia and/or dysarthria. Past research has demonstrated that simple temporal acoustic measures are sensitive to the presence of AOS. The aim of this study was to describe the change in temporal acoustic measures over time and assess if specific patterns of AOS or co-occurring aphasia or dysarthria impact the rate of change over time. Method: Durations for multiple productions of the words cat, catnip, catapult, andcatastrophe, in an imitative speech task, were recorded for 73 patients, with two to six visits each. A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess the cross-sectional differences and longitudinal influence of AOS subtype and presence of aphasia/dysarthria on speech rate. Pearson correlations were calculated between rate measures and performance on other clinical measures. Results: Cross-sectionally, patients with prosodic-predominant PPAOS produced words more slowly than those with phonetic-predominant PPAOS. Patients with either aphasia or dysarthria produced words more slowly than those without. Longitudinally, the speech rate of patients with phonetic-predominant PPAOS had a reduction of 0.5 syllables per second per year. Patients with prosodic-predominant AOS changed less quickly, as did those who developed aphasia. Dysarthria did not impact rate of change. There were strong associations between speech rate measures and other clinical indices of speech and language functioning. Conclusion: Simple temporal acoustic measures may reflect the subtype of AOS (phonetic or prosodic predominant), serve as an index of progression of AOS, and inform prognostication relative to the presenting combination of speech and language features.
AB - Purpose: Individuals with primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) have apraxia of speech (AOS) in which disruptions in articulation or prosody predominate the speech pattern, referred to, respectively, as phonetic or prosodic subtypes. Many develop aphasia and/or dysarthria. Past research has demonstrated that simple temporal acoustic measures are sensitive to the presence of AOS. The aim of this study was to describe the change in temporal acoustic measures over time and assess if specific patterns of AOS or co-occurring aphasia or dysarthria impact the rate of change over time. Method: Durations for multiple productions of the words cat, catnip, catapult, andcatastrophe, in an imitative speech task, were recorded for 73 patients, with two to six visits each. A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess the cross-sectional differences and longitudinal influence of AOS subtype and presence of aphasia/dysarthria on speech rate. Pearson correlations were calculated between rate measures and performance on other clinical measures. Results: Cross-sectionally, patients with prosodic-predominant PPAOS produced words more slowly than those with phonetic-predominant PPAOS. Patients with either aphasia or dysarthria produced words more slowly than those without. Longitudinally, the speech rate of patients with phonetic-predominant PPAOS had a reduction of 0.5 syllables per second per year. Patients with prosodic-predominant AOS changed less quickly, as did those who developed aphasia. Dysarthria did not impact rate of change. There were strong associations between speech rate measures and other clinical indices of speech and language functioning. Conclusion: Simple temporal acoustic measures may reflect the subtype of AOS (phonetic or prosodic predominant), serve as an index of progression of AOS, and inform prognostication relative to the presenting combination of speech and language features.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101792772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101792772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00253
DO - 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00253
M3 - Article
C2 - 33476188
AN - SCOPUS:85101792772
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 64
SP - 392
EP - 404
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 2
ER -