TY - JOUR
T1 - A gene-expression profiling score for prediction of outcome in patients with follicular lymphoma
T2 - a retrospective training and validation analysis in three international cohorts
AU - Huet, Sarah
AU - Tesson, Bruno
AU - Jais, Jean Philippe
AU - Feldman, Andrew L.
AU - Magnano, Laura
AU - Thomas, Emilie
AU - Traverse-Glehen, Alexandra
AU - Albaud, Benoit
AU - Carrère, Marjorie
AU - Xerri, Luc
AU - Ansell, Stephen M.
AU - Baseggio, Lucile
AU - Reyes, Cécile
AU - Tarte, Karin
AU - Boyault, Sandrine
AU - Haioun, Corinne
AU - Link, Brian K.
AU - Feugier, Pierre
AU - Lopez-Guillermo, Armando
AU - Tilly, Hervé
AU - Brice, Pauline
AU - Hayette, Sandrine
AU - Jardin, Fabrice
AU - Offner, Fritz
AU - Sujobert, Pierre
AU - Gentien, David
AU - Viari, Alain
AU - Campo, Elias
AU - Cerhan, James R.
AU - Salles, Gilles
N1 - Funding Information:
We have developed a predictor of progression-free survival based on gene expression in high-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma that identifies, at diagnosis, patients with an increased risk of progression when treated initially with rituximab and chemotherapy. The model was tested in three independent patient cohorts, for which it accurately identified a high-risk population independently of the FLIPI score and maintenance by rituximab. These results argue that our model relies on biologically relevant features of tumour cells involved in disease progression and not merely associates with known clinical predictors. The proportion of patients at high risk of progression differed slightly between the validation cohorts (34% in cohort 1, 23% in cohort 2, and 21% in cohorts 3), which might be explained by the specific selection for patients with high tumour burden in the PRIMA trial. The predictor was developed for use on the NanoString platform, 24 which enables accurate and reproducible quantification of RNA obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples 25 (or even on core biopsies). The NanoString platform is now present in many clinical laboratories that can apply the score calculation exactly as described here ( appendix p 3 ). Despite the variable geographical origin and the age of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue used in this study, sufficient quality of RNA was obtained in 94% of samples, confirming that this technology is a promising option for a clinical test based on gene expression. In our study, the genes included in the 23-gene model were selected on the basis of several experimental criteria but were also manually curated for their biological significance, which could introduce potential bias. Limitations of our study include the absence of patients having received bendamustine plus rituximab and that the 23-gene model could not predict patients' overall survival or the risk of transformation, given the few events observed in those cohorts. Another validation cohort would also have been helpful to confirm the unsupervised clustering analyses, but those analyses were exploratory to investigate potential links between lymphoma biology and the predictive model. Furthermore, although the predictor reflects several aspects of the tumour biology, including both lymphoma cells and their microenvironment, it would be premature to use its results to identify patients with specific biological characteristics that would benefit from particular targeted therapies. Finally, spatial heterogeneity has been shown to greatly affect mutation detection in follicular lymphoma. Whether or not the same limitation would be observed with gene-expression profiling of the tumours is uncertain. Other predictors of follicular lymphoma outcome combine mutation data with FLIPI score, 8,9 and our score showed similar performances (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) to predict progression-free survival or POD24. 9 Although the predictor based on gene expression could be combined with gene mutations to improve patient stratification, we aimed at using a single and highly reproducible technique that would be easily applied in the clinical setting. The LLMPP has previously reported outcome prediction by gene-expression signatures for patients with follicular lymphoma in the pre-rituximab era, which emphasised the role of non-malignant tumour-infiltrating cells. When applying the LLMPP algorithm 10 in our training cohort, we found that both IR1 and IR2 signatures were associated with increased progression-free survival. The lack of association of the IR2 signature with a poor outcome here is in agreement with results of immunohistochemistry studies in the rituximab era. 14,26,27 The correlation of macrophage infiltration with patients' prognosis is still controversial but might vary according to the use of rituximab or different chemotherapeutic regimens. 14 In particular, a doxorubicin-containing regimen has been suggested to abrogate the negative effect of CD163+ tumour-associated macrophages. 14 We also used an unsupervised analysis to investigate the biological processes acting in follicular lymphoma tumours at diagnosis. In an exploratory analysis, we identified a gene signature (ICA13) that was strongly associated with poor prognosis. Although the two analyses were done independently, nine of the 23 genes retained in the predictor ( CXCR4, DCAF12, E2F5, ORAI2, PRDM15, RASSF6, TAGAP, TCF4 , and USP44 ) were part of the ICA13 signature, the score for which was highly correlated with our predictor. We also found that some of the 23 genes had a distinct expression pattern between follicular lymphoma tumour B cells and normal B cells. Overall, these data are evidence that our model based on the expression of 23 genes recovers biologically meaningful attributes of lymphoma cells that are truly associated with the risk of disease progression. The ICA13 component revealed characteristics of Burkitt-like cells, dark-zone centroblasts, and immature pre-B cells. Although some progenitor-like transcriptional programmes might be reactivated within the germinal centre during normal B-cell development, the adverse prognostic significance of such a signature in follicular lymphoma and the strong negative effect of the expression of the surrogate light-chain VPREB1 transcript are provocative findings. An embryonic stem-cell-like transcriptional programme underlying histological transformation has been described in patients with follicular lymphomas, 28 and the expression of the surrogate light chains was observed in some cases of follicular lymphoma that transformed into B-lymphoblastic lymphomas. 29 Ultimately, one might hypothesise that: (1) a subset of follicular lymphoma cells could arise from self-renewing ancestral cells and retain a partially active progenitor-like expression programme, or could reacquire such an expression programme after re-entry cycles in the germinal centre; 30 and (2) such features, also reminiscent of Burkitt cells or progenitor B cells, or both, are related to disease aggressiveness in a subset of patients. In conclusion, we have established a 23-gene predictive score to identify two groups of patients with follicular lymphoma with markedly distinct outcomes when treated with immunochemotherapy. This predictor can be used in routine practice and captures multiple aspects of the biology of the tumour and the heterogeneous composition of the tumour microenvironment. Together with clinical parameters such as the FLIPI index, this score might allow clinicians to better adjust existing therapeutic options according to the patient risk category. For patients at low risk of progression, short treatments with a low toxicity profile should be considered. For patients with high-risk FLIPI and 23-gene scores, having a 50% risk estimate of lymphoma progression at 2 years, new treatment options should be developed. This group is an ideal target population in which to investigate innovative combinations that improve their outcome. Further studies are required to determine whether or not this model is valid in patients with low tumour burden (managed at present by watchful waiting or single-agent rituximab) and in patients treated with novel drugs that might interfere with tumour B cells and their microenvironment. 12 This 23-gene predictor could thus represent a promising tool to further develop personalised therapy for patients with follicular lymphoma. Contributors SHu and GS designed the study and searched the literature. SHu, CH, PF, HT, FJ, FO, PB, GS, ALF, SMA, BKL, JRC, LM, AL-G, and EC collected the samples and the clinical data. Haemopathologists AT-G, LX, ALF, and EC reviewed the cases. ET, BA, MC, LB, CR, SB, DG, and AV did the experiments and generated the data. SHu, BT, and J-PJ analysed the data. SHu, BT, and GS wrote the manuscript and drew the figures. All authors contributed substantially to data interpretation and revision of the manuscript. Declaration of interests GS reports grants from Roche/Genentech during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Merck, Roche, Servier, Morphosys, Gilead, and Kite Pharma outside the submitted work. CH reports personal fees from Roche during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Janssen, Gilead, Biogen, Sandoz, Pfizer, Takeda, Novartis, and Amgen outside the submitted work. PF reports personal fees from Roche outside the submitted work. BKL reports grants and personal fees from Roche/Genentech and personal fees from Celgene, Abbvie, Gilead, and Sandoz outside the submitted work. KT reports grants and personal fees from Celgene outside the submitted work. HT reports grants and personal fees from Celgene, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, and personal fees from Karyopharm and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. FJ reports personal fees from Roche, Janssen, and Celgene outside the submitted work. AL-G reports grants and other personal fees from Roche outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests. Acknowledgments We thank Nadine Vailhen, the Platform of Biological Resources, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil (bio-bank ID number: BB-0033-00021), and the Lymphoma Study Association pathology platform (Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil) for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sample storage for the PRIMA training and validation cohorts. This work was supported by a funding from Roche, by the SIRIC LYric Grant INCa-DGOS-4664, by the LYSARC (Lymphoma Study Academic Research organisation), and by the Spanish Plan Nacional de Investigacion SAF2015-64885-R. The funding of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic (UIMC) Lymphoma SPORE was supported by NIH grant P50 CA97274 and the Henry J Predolin Foundation. We thank Gilles Thomas for his initial input in this project, Bertrand Nadel and Sandrine Roulland for helpful discussions, and Stephanie Cox for her assistance. American Journal Experts, an independent medical writing agency, provided editing assistance for the report.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Background: Patients with follicular lymphoma have heterogeneous outcomes. Predictor models to distinguish, at diagnosis, between patients at high and low risk of progression are needed. The objective of this study was to use gene-expression profiling data to build and validate a predictive model of outcome for patients treated in the rituximab era. Methods: A training set of fresh-frozen tumour biopsies was prospectively obtained from 160 untreated patients with high-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma enrolled in the phase 3 randomised PRIMA trial, in which rituximab maintenance was evaluated after rituximab plus chemotherapy induction (median follow-up 6·6 years [IQR 6·0–7·0]). RNA of sufficient quality was obtained for 149 of 160 cases, and Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 microarrays were used for gene-expression profiling. We did a multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify genes with expression levels associated with progression-free survival independently of maintenance treatment in a subgroup of 134 randomised patients. Expression levels from 95 curated genes were then determined by digital expression profiling (NanoString technology) in 53 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of the training set to compare the technical reproducibility of expression levels for each gene between technologies. Genes with high correlation (>0·75) were included in an L2-penalised Cox model adjusted on rituximab maintenance to build a predictive score for progression-free survival. The model was validated using NanoString technology to digitally quantify gene expression in 488 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from three independent international patient cohorts from the PRIMA trial (n=178; distinct from the training cohort), the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE project (n=201), and the Barcelona Hospital Clinic (n=109). All tissue samples consisted of pretreatment diagnostic biopsies and were confirmed as follicular lymphoma grade 1–3a. The patients were all treated with regimens containing rituximab and chemotherapy, possibly followed by either rituximab maintenance or ibritumomab–tiuxetan consolidation. We determined an optimum threshold on the score to predict patients at low risk and high risk of progression. The model, including the multigene score and the threshold, was initially evaluated in the three validation cohorts separately. The sensitivity and specificity of the score for the prediction of the risk of lymphoma progression at 2 years were assessed on the combined validation cohorts. Findings: In the training cohort, the expression levels of 395 genes were associated with a risk of progression. 23 genes reflecting both B-cell biology and tumour microenvironment with correlation coefficients greater than 0·75 between the two technologies and sample types were retained to build a predictive model that identified a population at an increased risk of progression (p<0·0001). In a multivariate Cox model for progression-free survival adjusted on rituximab maintenance treatment and Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 1 (FLIPI-1) score, this predictor independently predicted progression (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] of the high-risk group compared with the low-risk group 3·68, 95% CI 2·19–6·17 [p<0·0001]). The 5-year progression-free survival was 26% (95% CI 16–43) in the high-risk group and 73% (64–83) in the low-risk group. The predictor performances were confirmed in each of the individual validation cohorts (aHR comparing high-risk to low-risk groups 2·57 [95% CI 1·65–4·01] in cohort 1; 2·12 [1·32–3·39] in cohort 2; and 2·11 [1·01–4·41] in cohort 3). In the combined validation cohort, the median progression-free survival was 3·1 years (95% CI 2·4–4·8) in the high-risk group and 10·8 years (10·1–not reached) in the low-risk group (p<0·0001). The risk of lymphoma progression at 2 years was 38% (95% CI 29–46) in the high-risk group and 19% (15–24) in the low-risk group. In a multivariate analysis, the score predicted progression-free survival independently of anti-CD20 maintenance treatment and of the FLIPI score (aHR for the combined cohort 2·30, 95% CI 1·72–3·07). Interpretation: We developed and validated a robust 23-gene expression-based predictor of progression-free survival that is applicable to routinely available formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumour biopsies from patients with follicular lymphoma at time of diagnosis. Applying this score could allow individualised therapy for patients according to their risk category. Funding: Roche, SIRIC Lyric, LYSARC, National Institutes of Health, the Henry J Predolin Foundation, and the Spanish Plan Nacional de Investigacion.
AB - Background: Patients with follicular lymphoma have heterogeneous outcomes. Predictor models to distinguish, at diagnosis, between patients at high and low risk of progression are needed. The objective of this study was to use gene-expression profiling data to build and validate a predictive model of outcome for patients treated in the rituximab era. Methods: A training set of fresh-frozen tumour biopsies was prospectively obtained from 160 untreated patients with high-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma enrolled in the phase 3 randomised PRIMA trial, in which rituximab maintenance was evaluated after rituximab plus chemotherapy induction (median follow-up 6·6 years [IQR 6·0–7·0]). RNA of sufficient quality was obtained for 149 of 160 cases, and Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 microarrays were used for gene-expression profiling. We did a multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify genes with expression levels associated with progression-free survival independently of maintenance treatment in a subgroup of 134 randomised patients. Expression levels from 95 curated genes were then determined by digital expression profiling (NanoString technology) in 53 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of the training set to compare the technical reproducibility of expression levels for each gene between technologies. Genes with high correlation (>0·75) were included in an L2-penalised Cox model adjusted on rituximab maintenance to build a predictive score for progression-free survival. The model was validated using NanoString technology to digitally quantify gene expression in 488 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from three independent international patient cohorts from the PRIMA trial (n=178; distinct from the training cohort), the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE project (n=201), and the Barcelona Hospital Clinic (n=109). All tissue samples consisted of pretreatment diagnostic biopsies and were confirmed as follicular lymphoma grade 1–3a. The patients were all treated with regimens containing rituximab and chemotherapy, possibly followed by either rituximab maintenance or ibritumomab–tiuxetan consolidation. We determined an optimum threshold on the score to predict patients at low risk and high risk of progression. The model, including the multigene score and the threshold, was initially evaluated in the three validation cohorts separately. The sensitivity and specificity of the score for the prediction of the risk of lymphoma progression at 2 years were assessed on the combined validation cohorts. Findings: In the training cohort, the expression levels of 395 genes were associated with a risk of progression. 23 genes reflecting both B-cell biology and tumour microenvironment with correlation coefficients greater than 0·75 between the two technologies and sample types were retained to build a predictive model that identified a population at an increased risk of progression (p<0·0001). In a multivariate Cox model for progression-free survival adjusted on rituximab maintenance treatment and Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 1 (FLIPI-1) score, this predictor independently predicted progression (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] of the high-risk group compared with the low-risk group 3·68, 95% CI 2·19–6·17 [p<0·0001]). The 5-year progression-free survival was 26% (95% CI 16–43) in the high-risk group and 73% (64–83) in the low-risk group. The predictor performances were confirmed in each of the individual validation cohorts (aHR comparing high-risk to low-risk groups 2·57 [95% CI 1·65–4·01] in cohort 1; 2·12 [1·32–3·39] in cohort 2; and 2·11 [1·01–4·41] in cohort 3). In the combined validation cohort, the median progression-free survival was 3·1 years (95% CI 2·4–4·8) in the high-risk group and 10·8 years (10·1–not reached) in the low-risk group (p<0·0001). The risk of lymphoma progression at 2 years was 38% (95% CI 29–46) in the high-risk group and 19% (15–24) in the low-risk group. In a multivariate analysis, the score predicted progression-free survival independently of anti-CD20 maintenance treatment and of the FLIPI score (aHR for the combined cohort 2·30, 95% CI 1·72–3·07). Interpretation: We developed and validated a robust 23-gene expression-based predictor of progression-free survival that is applicable to routinely available formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumour biopsies from patients with follicular lymphoma at time of diagnosis. Applying this score could allow individualised therapy for patients according to their risk category. Funding: Roche, SIRIC Lyric, LYSARC, National Institutes of Health, the Henry J Predolin Foundation, and the Spanish Plan Nacional de Investigacion.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042184144&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042184144&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30102-5
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30102-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 29475724
AN - SCOPUS:85042184144
SN - 1470-2045
VL - 19
SP - 549
EP - 561
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
IS - 4
ER -