The Organ Transplant Imperative

Wil L. Santivasi, Jacob J. Strand, Paul Mueller, Thomas J. Beckman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations


More than 120,000 US patients were listed for solid organ transplants in 2016. Although data are scarce, we suspect that many of these patients will die while awaiting transplant and without engaging in goals-of-care discussions with their physicians. The challenges of addressing goals of care in patients with malignancy, end-stage renal disease, and heart failure have been studied. However, there is sparse literature on addressing goals of care throughout the dynamic process of transplant assessment and listing. We propose the concept of an organ transplant imperative, which is the perceived obligation by patients and health care providers to proceed with organ transplant and to avoid advance care planning and triggered goals-of-care discussions, even in situations in which patients' clinical trajectories have worsened, resulting in poor quality of life and low likelihood of meaningful survival. We situate this concept within the paradigms of clinical inertia and the treatment and technological imperatives. We illustrate this concept by describing a patient with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) who was hoping for a liver transplant, who was caught between the conflicting perspectives of specialist and primary care physicians, and who died of complications of ESLD without experiencing the benefits of advance care planning. Greater awareness of the transplant imperative should generate a shared understanding among specialists, generalists, and patients and will provide opportunities for more formalized involvement of palliative medicine experts in the care of transplant patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)940-946
Number of pages7
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'The Organ Transplant Imperative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this