The efficacy of resilience training programs: A systematic review protocol

Aaron L. Leppin, Michael R. Gionfriddo, Amit Sood, Victor M. Montori, Patricia J. Erwin, Claudia Zeballos-Palacios, Pavithra R. Bora, Megan M. Dulohery, Juan P. Brito, Kasey R. Boehmer, Jon C. Tilburt

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations


Background: Resilience has been defined as the ability of individuals to manage and adapt to stress and life challenges. Training programs that develop and/or enhance resilience may have efficacy in improving health, well-being, and quality of life. Because patients with chronic conditions must reliably self-manage their health, strategies to bolster resilience in this population may be of particular value. The objectives of this systematic review are to synthesize the evidence of resilience training program efficacy in improving outcomes related to quality of life, self-efficacy and activation, and resilience and coping ability in: 1) diverse adult populations; and 2) patients with chronic conditions.Methods/Design: We will conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of any program designed to enhance resilience in adults that measure any outcome against any comparator. We will search multiple electronic databases, trial registries, bibliographies, and will contact authors and experts to identify studies. We will use systematic review software to independently and in duplicate screen reports and extract data. We will extract characteristics of the study populations, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and quality/risk of bias. Primary, patient reported outcomes will be categorized into domains of quality of life, self-efficacy, and resilience. Secondary outcomes will be considered based on findings of the review. We will attempt meta-analysis by pooling standardized mean differences and minimally important differences (MIDs), when possible. Planned trial subgroup analyses are: 1) studies of patients with chronic conditions; 2) studies with placebo controls; 3) studies with similar intervention characteristics; and 4) studies with common lengths of follow-up.Discussion: This study is intended to accumulate the evidence for resilience training programs in improving quality of life, resilience, and self-efficacy for care management, particularly among adult patients with chronic conditions. Its findings will be valuable to policy-makers, funding agencies, clinicians, and patients seeking innovative and effective ways to achieve patient-centered care. Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42014007185.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number20
JournalSystematic reviews
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 6 2014


  • Randomized controlled trials
  • Resilience
  • Resilience training
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)


Dive into the research topics of 'The efficacy of resilience training programs: A systematic review protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this