@article{36b54fbc4e7b41af8dbed0e26bf2f040,
title = "The concept of mesothelioma in situ, with consideration of its potential impact on cytology diagnosis",
abstract = "Diffuse malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an incurable tumour of the serosal membranes, which is often caused by exposure to asbestos and commonly diagnosed at advanced stage. Malignant mesothelioma in situ (MMIS) is now included as diagnostic category by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, our international survey of 34 pulmonary pathologists with an interest in MM diagnosis highlights inconsistency regarding how the diagnosis is being made by experts, despite published guidelines. Whilst the WHO restricts the diagnosis to surgical samples, the very concept has implication for cytological diagnosis, which is already regarded as controversial in itself by some. MMIS is currently only applicable as precursor to MM with an epithelioid component, and raises the possibility for different molecular pathways for different histological MM subtypes. The clinical implications of MMIS at this stage are uncertain, but aggressive therapies are being initiated in some instances. Based on the results of the survey we here present a critical appraisal of the concept, its clinical and conceptual implications and provide practice suggestions for diagnosis. A low threshold for ancillary testing is suggested. The designations of {\textquoteleft}malignant mesothelioma, cannot exclude MMIS{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}atypical mesothelial proliferation with molecular indicators of malignancy, so-called MMIS{\textquoteright} could be used on cytology samples, adding {\textquoteleft}no evidence of invasion in sample provided{\textquoteright} for surgical samples. Clinical and radiological correlation are integral to diagnosis and best done at multidisciplinary meetings. Finally, collaborative studies are required to improve our understanding of MMIS.",
keywords = "Diffuse malignant mesothelioma, WHO, cytology diagnosis, early diagnosis, mesothelioma in situ",
author = "Sonja Klebe and Yukio Nakatani and Katalin Dobra and Butnor, {Kelly J.} and Roden, {Anja C.} and Nicholson, {Andrew G.} and Marchevsky, {Alberto M.} and Husain, {Aliya N.} and Amanda Segal and Walts, {Ann E.} and Birgit Weynand and Michael, {Claire W.} and Sanja Dacic and David Godbolt and Richard Attanoos and Eric Santoni-Rugiu and Fran{\c c}oise Galateau-Salle and Kenzo Hiroshima and Moreira, {Andre L.} and Juliet Burn and Kazuki Nabeshima and Gibbs, {Allen R.} and Andrew Churg and Litzky, {Leslie A.} and Luka Brcic and Tsao, {Ming Sound} and Mari Mino-Kenudson and R{\o}rvig, {Sara B.} and Tazelaar, {Henry D.} and Thomas Krausz and Zhang, {Yu Zhi} and Chirieac, {Lucian R.} and Beasley, {Mary B.} and Anders Hjerpe",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the Douglas Henderson Bequest for Research into Mesothelioma, Flinders University, SA, Australia. Richard Attanoos provides expert testimony in asbestos litigation for claimants, defendants and on joint basis; Allen Gibbs performs medicolegal work associated with mesothelioma and asbestos related diseases; Mary Beth Beasley serves as a consultant for various law firms in asbestos litigation; Luka Brcic reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca , personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim , personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, personal fees and grants from Takeda , personal fees and non-financial support from Roche , personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer , personal fees from Eli Lilly , and a grant from BMS , all of which are outside the submitted work. The other authors state that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.pathol.2020.12.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "446--453",
journal = "Pathology",
issn = "0031-3025",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",
}