Survival Patterns Based on First-site–specific Visceral Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Are Outcomes of Visceral Metastases the Same?

Mohamed E. Ahmed, Ahmed M. Mahmoud, Guiseppe Reitano, Wael Zeina, Kelly Lehner, Carter A. Day, Irbaz Riaz, Daniel S. Childs, Jacob J. Orme, A. Tuba Kendi, Geoffrey B. Johnson, R. Jeffrey Karnes, Eugene D. Kwon, Jack R. Andrews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and objective: Visceral metastatic disease in prostate cancer patients conveys a poor prognosis. Using advanced imaging techniques, studies have demonstrated increasing detection rates of visceral metastasis. Visceral metastases are now seen in up to 30–60% of prostate cancer patients. Survival patterns of site-specific visceral metastasis are described poorly in the literature. Here, we sought to investigate survival patterns in prostate cancer patients according to their first detected site of visceral metastasis. Methods: Retrospectively, we identified 203 prostate cancer patients with visceral metastases from the Mayo Clinic Advanced Prostate Cancer Registry. Patients were divided into three groups according to the first site of visceral metastases detected: lung, brain, or liver. Visceral metastases were detected primarily on either metabolic imaging (C-11 choline) or prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography (CT) scan. Confirmation of visceral metastasis diagnosis was established with either biopsy when feasible or focused conventional imaging, including focused CT or magnetic resonance imaging. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression model was conducted to assess different variables that affect overall and cancer-specific survival. Key findings and limitations: Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up duration of 16.2 (3.9–49.8) mo, the overall and cancer-specific survival of the entire cohort suggests better survival patterns in patients with first-site lung metastases than in patients with first-site brain or liver metastases (p < 0.0001). In univariate and multivariate analyses of factors impacting patients’ overall and cancer-specific survival, a high prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis of visceral metastasis, concomitant bone and lymph node disease, and more than four visceral metastases were associated with poor overall and cancer-specific survival (p < 0.05). On the contrary, first-site lung metastasis was associated with improved overall and cancer-specific survival, compared with first-site liver and brain metastases (p < 0.001). Conclusions and clinical implications: These data suggest that prostate cancer patients with visceral metastatic disease have varying survival patterns according to first-site detected visceral metastasis. In our cohort, patients with first-site lung metastasis demonstrated better survival outcomes than patients with first-site brain or liver metastasis. Patient summary: Our study explored the survival outcomes among patients with visceral metastatic prostate cancer employing cutting-edge imaging methods. Prostate cancer patients with metastases to different organs have different survival rates. Patients with cancer spreading to the lungs first showed better survival than those with cancer spreading to the brain or liver first.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)38-45
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Urology Open Science
Volume66
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

Keywords

  • Metastatic disease
  • Overall survival
  • Prostate cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Survival Patterns Based on First-site–specific Visceral Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Are Outcomes of Visceral Metastases the Same?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this