Surgeons’ dominant surgical modality: Impacts on wellbeing, burnout, and interventions for neuromusculoskeletal disorders

Hamid Norasi, Joseph Kim, M. Susan Hallbeck, Petrine E. Cerri, Enrique F. Elli, Matthew K. Tollefson, Kristi L. Harold, Ram A. Pathak, Raymond Pak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the impact of surgical modalities on surgeon wellbeing with a focus on burnout, job satisfaction, and interventions used to address neuromusculoskeletal disorders (NMSDs). Methods: An electronic survey was sent to surgeons across an academic integrated multihospital system. The survey consisted of 47 questions investigating different aspects of surgeons’ wellbeing. Results: Out of 245 thoracic and abdominopelvic surgeons, 79 surgeons (32.2 ​%) responded, and 65 surgeons (82 ​%) were able to be categorized as having a dominant surgical modality. Compared to robotic surgeons, laparoscopic (p ​= ​0.042) and open (p ​= ​0.012) surgeons reported more frequent feelings of burnout. The number of surgeons who used any treatment/intervention to minimize the operative discomfort/pain was lower for robotic surgeons than the other three modalities (all p ​< ​0.05). Conclusions: NMSDs affect different aspects of surgeons’ lives and occupations. Robotic surgery was associated with decreased feelings of burnout than the other modalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number115769
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume237
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2024

Keywords

  • Da vinci surgical system
  • Endoscopic surgery
  • Ergonomics
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Open surgery
  • Robotic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgeons’ dominant surgical modality: Impacts on wellbeing, burnout, and interventions for neuromusculoskeletal disorders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this