TY - JOUR
T1 - Shoulder mechanical impingement risk associated with manual wheelchair tasks in individuals with spinal cord injury
AU - Mozingo, Joseph D.
AU - Akbari-Shandiz, Mohsen
AU - Murthy, Naveen S.
AU - Van Straaten, Meegan G.
AU - Schueler, Beth A.
AU - Holmes, David R.
AU - McCollough, Cynthia H.
AU - Zhao, Kristin D.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by NIH / NIAMS T32 AR56950 and Minnesota Partnership for Biotechnology and Medical Genomics (MNP IF # 14.02 ). We thank Mark Hindal, R.T.(R) for assistance with data collection, Ryan Lennon, M.S. and Stefan Madansingh, Ph.D. for statistical support, and Vipul Lugade Ph.D. and Ryan Breighner Ph.D. for development of code to support data processing.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - Background: Most individuals with spinal cord injury who use manual wheelchairs experience shoulder pain related to wheelchair use, potentially in part from mechanical impingement of soft tissue structures within the subacromial space. There is evidence suggesting that scapula and humerus motion during certain wheelchair tasks occurs in directions that may reduce the subacromial space, but it hasn't been thoroughly characterized in this context. Methods: Shoulder motion was imaged and quantified during scapular plane elevation with/without handheld load, propulsion with/without added resistance, sideways lean, and weight-relief raise in ten manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury using biplane fluoroscopy and computed tomography. For each position, minimum distance between rotator cuff tendon insertions (infraspinatus, subscapularis, supraspinatus) and the coracoacromial arch was determined. Tendon thickness was measured with ultrasound, and impingement risk scores were defined for each task based on frequency and amount of tendon compression. Findings: Periods of impingement were identified during scapular plane elevation and propulsion but not during pressure reliefs in most participants. There was a significant effect of activity on impingement risk scores (P < 0.0001), with greatest impingement risk during scapular plane elevation followed by propulsion. Impingement risk scores were not significantly different between scapular plane elevation loading conditions (P = 0.202) or propulsion resistances (P = 0.223). The infraspinatus and supraspinatus tendons were both susceptible to impingement during scapular plane elevation (by acromion), whereas the supraspinatus was most susceptible during propulsion (by acromion and coracoacromial ligament). Interpretation: The occurrence of mechanical impingement during certain manual wheelchair tasks, even without increased load/resistance, demonstrates the importance of kinematics inherent to a task as a determinant of impingement. Frequency of and technique used to complete daily tasks should be carefully considered to reduce impingement risk, which may help preserve shoulder health long-term.
AB - Background: Most individuals with spinal cord injury who use manual wheelchairs experience shoulder pain related to wheelchair use, potentially in part from mechanical impingement of soft tissue structures within the subacromial space. There is evidence suggesting that scapula and humerus motion during certain wheelchair tasks occurs in directions that may reduce the subacromial space, but it hasn't been thoroughly characterized in this context. Methods: Shoulder motion was imaged and quantified during scapular plane elevation with/without handheld load, propulsion with/without added resistance, sideways lean, and weight-relief raise in ten manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury using biplane fluoroscopy and computed tomography. For each position, minimum distance between rotator cuff tendon insertions (infraspinatus, subscapularis, supraspinatus) and the coracoacromial arch was determined. Tendon thickness was measured with ultrasound, and impingement risk scores were defined for each task based on frequency and amount of tendon compression. Findings: Periods of impingement were identified during scapular plane elevation and propulsion but not during pressure reliefs in most participants. There was a significant effect of activity on impingement risk scores (P < 0.0001), with greatest impingement risk during scapular plane elevation followed by propulsion. Impingement risk scores were not significantly different between scapular plane elevation loading conditions (P = 0.202) or propulsion resistances (P = 0.223). The infraspinatus and supraspinatus tendons were both susceptible to impingement during scapular plane elevation (by acromion), whereas the supraspinatus was most susceptible during propulsion (by acromion and coracoacromial ligament). Interpretation: The occurrence of mechanical impingement during certain manual wheelchair tasks, even without increased load/resistance, demonstrates the importance of kinematics inherent to a task as a determinant of impingement. Frequency of and technique used to complete daily tasks should be carefully considered to reduce impingement risk, which may help preserve shoulder health long-term.
KW - Fluoroscopy
KW - Kinematics
KW - Rotator cuff
KW - Subacromial space
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078975314&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078975314&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.10.017
DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.10.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 32035338
AN - SCOPUS:85078975314
SN - 0268-0033
VL - 71
SP - 221
EP - 229
JO - Clinical Biomechanics
JF - Clinical Biomechanics
ER -