Short-term outcomes of acute knee injuries: Does the provider make a difference?

Peter C. Amadio, Sherine E. Gabriel, Barbara P. Yawn, W. Scott Harmsen, Duane M. Ilstrup, Jeannie Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


Objective. To compare the short-term outcomes of acute knee injuries treated by specialists and generalists. Methods. Using patient logs, 168 adults with acute knee injuries were identified; 131 (78%) completed a questionnaire 3 months after initial presentation. Results. The mean age of the 77 male and 54 female responders was 34.6 years (range 18-73 years). The injuries were classified as mild (n = 35), moderate (n = 75), or severe (n = 21). Most responders were satisfied with their care and outcome, but 22% noted some functional limitations. The 59 patients seeing an orthopedist were more likely to have had a severe injury, more physician visits, activity limitations, lost time from work or recreation, and more pain when compared with the 72 patients who never saw an orthopedist. Excluding surgical patients, however, satisfaction was not significantly different by provider. After multivariate modeling (adjusting for age, sex, injury severity, and diagnosis), there was no significant association between having seen an orthopedist and either treatment success or satisfaction. Conclusion. With the exception of time lost for recuperation in our community there is little difference in short-term outcome for patients with acute knee injury not undergoing surgery, regardless of the specialty of the treating physician.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)361-365
Number of pages5
JournalArthritis Care and Research
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 15 2002


  • Functional outcome
  • Knee injury
  • Provider type
  • Satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology


Dive into the research topics of 'Short-term outcomes of acute knee injuries: Does the provider make a difference?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this