TY - JOUR
T1 - Segmentectomy versus wedge resection for non-small cell lung cancer in high-risk operable patients
AU - Kent, Michael
AU - Landreneau, Rodney
AU - Mandrekar, Sumithra
AU - Hillman, Shauna
AU - Nichols, Francis
AU - Jones, David
AU - Starnes, Sandra
AU - Tan, Angelina
AU - Putnam, Joe
AU - Meyers, Brian
AU - Daly, Benedict
AU - Fernando, Hiran C.
PY - 2013/11
Y1 - 2013/11
N2 - Background Patients with early-stage lung cancer and limited pulmonary reserve may not be appropriate candidates for lobectomy. In these situations, sublobar resection (wedge or segmentectomy) is generally performed. Many physicians believe that segmentectomy is superior because it allows for an improved parenchymal margin and nodal sampling. Methods We performed an analysis using operative and pathology reports collected as part of planned data collection for American College of Surgeons Surgical Oncology Group (ACOSG) Z4032. This was a prospective trial in which patients with clinical stage I lung cancer and limited pulmonary function were randomized to sublobar resection with or without brachytherapy. The operative approach (video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] vs thoracotomy), extent of resection, and degree of lymph node evaluation were at the discretion of the individual surgeon. The primary aim of this analysis was to compare the parenchymal margin achieved between segmentectomy and wedge resection. Secondary aims included the extent of nodal staging and whether the operative approach (VATS vs open) had an effect on margin status and nodal evaluation. Results Among 210 patients, 135 (64%) underwent a VATS approach and 75 (36%) a thoracotomy. A segmentectomy was performed in 57 patients (27%) and a wedge resection in 153 patients (73%). There were no significant differences in the degree of nodal upstaging, stations sampled, or parenchymal margin obtained between VATS and thoracotomy. However, significant differences were observed between patients who underwent a segmentectomy and those who underwent a wedge resection with regard to parenchymal margin (1.5 cm vs 0.8 cm, p = 0.0001), nodal upstaging (9% vs 1%, p = 0.006), and nodal stations sampled (3 vs 1, p < 0.0001). Notably, 41% of patients treated by wedge resection had no nodes sampled at the time of operation compared with 2% of those who underwent segmentectomy (p < 0.0001). Conclusions In ACOSG Z4032, wedge resection, regardless of the approach, was associated with a smaller parenchymal margin and a lower yield of lymph nodes and rate of nodal upstaging when compared with segmentectomy.
AB - Background Patients with early-stage lung cancer and limited pulmonary reserve may not be appropriate candidates for lobectomy. In these situations, sublobar resection (wedge or segmentectomy) is generally performed. Many physicians believe that segmentectomy is superior because it allows for an improved parenchymal margin and nodal sampling. Methods We performed an analysis using operative and pathology reports collected as part of planned data collection for American College of Surgeons Surgical Oncology Group (ACOSG) Z4032. This was a prospective trial in which patients with clinical stage I lung cancer and limited pulmonary function were randomized to sublobar resection with or without brachytherapy. The operative approach (video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] vs thoracotomy), extent of resection, and degree of lymph node evaluation were at the discretion of the individual surgeon. The primary aim of this analysis was to compare the parenchymal margin achieved between segmentectomy and wedge resection. Secondary aims included the extent of nodal staging and whether the operative approach (VATS vs open) had an effect on margin status and nodal evaluation. Results Among 210 patients, 135 (64%) underwent a VATS approach and 75 (36%) a thoracotomy. A segmentectomy was performed in 57 patients (27%) and a wedge resection in 153 patients (73%). There were no significant differences in the degree of nodal upstaging, stations sampled, or parenchymal margin obtained between VATS and thoracotomy. However, significant differences were observed between patients who underwent a segmentectomy and those who underwent a wedge resection with regard to parenchymal margin (1.5 cm vs 0.8 cm, p = 0.0001), nodal upstaging (9% vs 1%, p = 0.006), and nodal stations sampled (3 vs 1, p < 0.0001). Notably, 41% of patients treated by wedge resection had no nodes sampled at the time of operation compared with 2% of those who underwent segmentectomy (p < 0.0001). Conclusions In ACOSG Z4032, wedge resection, regardless of the approach, was associated with a smaller parenchymal margin and a lower yield of lymph nodes and rate of nodal upstaging when compared with segmentectomy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887033886&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887033886&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.104
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.104
M3 - Article
C2 - 23998400
AN - SCOPUS:84887033886
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 96
SP - 1747
EP - 1755
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 5
ER -