Scores from Riding's cognitive styles analysis have poor test-retest reliability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


Background: The Cognitive Styles Analysis (CSA) purports to assess two cognitive style dimensions, wholist-analytic (WA) and verbalizer-imager (VI). CSA score reliability has not been studied in medical education. Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate test-retest reliability and learner-perceived accuracy of CSA scores. Method: CSA scores were measured twice and perceived accuracy of classifications once among 89 family medicine residents, internal medicine residents, and medical students. Results: Mean ± standard deviation interval between tests was 564 ± 136 days. Test-retest correlation for WA scores was 0.30, and for VI scores was 0.12. Upon retesting 44 learners (49%) were classified under a different WA style, and 56 learners (63%) were classified under a different VI style. There were 58 of 73 learners (79%) who agreed or strongly agreed with their WA classification, whereas 51 of 76 (67%) agreed with their VI classification. Conclusions: CSA scores have poor test-retest reliability. Educators may wish to avoid using the CSA and should exercise caution when interpreting CSA scores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)225-229
Number of pages5
JournalTeaching and learning in medicine
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jul 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education


Dive into the research topics of 'Scores from Riding's cognitive styles analysis have poor test-retest reliability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this