TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and efficacy of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in older patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer
T2 - an age-specific subgroup analysis of MONARCH 2 and 3 trials
AU - Goetz, Matthew P.
AU - Okera, Meena
AU - Wildiers, Hans
AU - Campone, Mario
AU - Grischke, Eva Maria
AU - Manso, Luis
AU - André, Valérie A.M.
AU - Chouaki, Nadia
AU - San Antonio, Belén
AU - Toi, Masakazu
AU - Sledge, George W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding M.P. Goetz reports research funding from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Defense, Mayo Development, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Alliance Foundation Trials, Sermonix Pharmaceutical, Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium, and Minnesota Partnership for Biotechnology and Medical Genomics. H. Wildiers reports consulting fees and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Biocartis, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, PUMA Biotechnology, Roche, Sirtex, and Daiiji (all to institution); research grants from Roche and Novartis (all to institution); and travel support from Roche and Pfizer (to H.W). M. Campone received travel support from Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, and AstraZeneca. L. Manso reports consulting fees from Roche, Astra, Novartis, Tesaro, and Pfizer. M. Toi reports research funding from Takeda, Chugai, Pfizer, Taiho, Kyowa-Kirin, Eisai, JBCRG association, Daiichi-Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Astellas, Shimadzu, Nippon Kayaku, and AFI technology. G. Sledge Jr. reports research support from Eli Lilly and Company; research support from Pfizer. Financial interests M.P. Goetz reports consulting fees (all to institution) from Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Biovica, Novartis, Sermonix, Context Pharm, Pfizer, and Biotheranostics. M. Toi reports consultation fees from Kyowa-Kirin, Daiichi-Sankyo, Konica-Minolta, BMS, Athenex Oncology, and Bertis; and lecture fees from Takeda, Chugai, Eli Lilly Pfizer, Taiho, Kyowa-Kirin, Eisai, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD, AstraZeneca, Astellas, Shimadzu, Genomic Health, Novartis, Yakult, and Nippon Kayaku. V.A-M. André, N. Chouaki, and B. San Antonio report stocks/shares in Eli Lilly and Company. Non-financial interests M.P. Goetz has consulted for or is/was a board member of NCI Breast Cancer Steering Committee, Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium, NCCN Breast Cancer Panel, Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guide for CYP2D6 and Tamoxifen, NCI SPORE Special Emphasis Panel, and Academic and Community Cancer Research United. M. Campone has consulted for Pierre Fabre Oncology, Sanofi, Novartis, and Servier; speakers’ bureau, Novartis. M. Toi has served on Editorial Boards for Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Scientific Reports, Frontier Oncology, Cancer Science, International Journal of Clinical Oncology, Asian Journal of Surgery, and International Journal of Biological Markers; and is/was a member of the Board of Directors for Japanese Breast Cancer Research group association, Kyoto Breast Cancer Research network, and Organisation for Oncology and Translational Research. G. Sledge Jr. reports consulting for Syndax, Symphogen, Verseau Therapeutics, and Eli Lilly and Company; Board of Directors for Tessa Therapeutics. Employment V.A-M. André, N. Chouaki, and B. San Antonio are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. M. Okera declares no competing interests. E-M. Grischke declares no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Purpose: Abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) has demonstrated significant efficacy benefits in HR+ , HER2− advanced breast cancer patients in the Phase 3 studies MONARCH 2 (fulvestrant as ET) and MONARCH 3 (letrozole or anastrozole as ET). Here, we report age-specific safety and efficacy outcomes. Methods: Exploratory analyses of MONARCH 2 and 3 were performed for 3 age groups (<65, 65–74, and ≥75 years). For safety, data were pooled from both studies; for efficacy, a subgroup analysis of PFS was performed for each trial independently. Results: Pooled safety data were available for 1152 patients. Clinically relevant diarrhea (Grade 2/3) was higher in older patients receiving abemaciclib + ET (<65, 39.5%; 65–74, 45.2%; ≥75, 55.4%) versus placebo + ET (<65, 6.8%; 65–74, 4.5%; ≥75, 16.0%). Nausea, decreased appetite, and venous thromboembolic events were all moderately higher in older patients. Neutropenia (Grade ≥ 3) did not differ as a function of age in the abemaciclib + ET arm (<65, 25.8%; 65–74, 27.4%; ≥75, 18.1%). Dose adjustments and discontinuation rates were slightly higher in older patients. Abemaciclib + ET improved PFS compared with placebo + ET independent of patient age, with no significant difference in abemaciclib treatment effect between the 3 age groups (MONARCH 2: interaction p-value, 0.695; MONARCH 3: interaction p-value, 0.634). Estimated hazard ratios ranged from 0.523–0.633 (MONARCH 2) and 0.480–0.635 (MONARCH 3). Conclusions: While higher rates of adverse events were reported in older patients, they were manageable with dose adjustments and concomitant medication. Importantly, a consistent efficacy benefit was observed across all age groups. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02107703 (first posted April 8, 2014) and NCT02246621 (first posted September 23, 2014).
AB - Purpose: Abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) has demonstrated significant efficacy benefits in HR+ , HER2− advanced breast cancer patients in the Phase 3 studies MONARCH 2 (fulvestrant as ET) and MONARCH 3 (letrozole or anastrozole as ET). Here, we report age-specific safety and efficacy outcomes. Methods: Exploratory analyses of MONARCH 2 and 3 were performed for 3 age groups (<65, 65–74, and ≥75 years). For safety, data were pooled from both studies; for efficacy, a subgroup analysis of PFS was performed for each trial independently. Results: Pooled safety data were available for 1152 patients. Clinically relevant diarrhea (Grade 2/3) was higher in older patients receiving abemaciclib + ET (<65, 39.5%; 65–74, 45.2%; ≥75, 55.4%) versus placebo + ET (<65, 6.8%; 65–74, 4.5%; ≥75, 16.0%). Nausea, decreased appetite, and venous thromboembolic events were all moderately higher in older patients. Neutropenia (Grade ≥ 3) did not differ as a function of age in the abemaciclib + ET arm (<65, 25.8%; 65–74, 27.4%; ≥75, 18.1%). Dose adjustments and discontinuation rates were slightly higher in older patients. Abemaciclib + ET improved PFS compared with placebo + ET independent of patient age, with no significant difference in abemaciclib treatment effect between the 3 age groups (MONARCH 2: interaction p-value, 0.695; MONARCH 3: interaction p-value, 0.634). Estimated hazard ratios ranged from 0.523–0.633 (MONARCH 2) and 0.480–0.635 (MONARCH 3). Conclusions: While higher rates of adverse events were reported in older patients, they were manageable with dose adjustments and concomitant medication. Importantly, a consistent efficacy benefit was observed across all age groups. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02107703 (first posted April 8, 2014) and NCT02246621 (first posted September 23, 2014).
KW - Abemaciclib
KW - Age
KW - Endocrine therapy
KW - HER2−
KW - HR+
KW - Metastatic breast cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098710267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098710267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10549-020-06029-y
DO - 10.1007/s10549-020-06029-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 33392835
AN - SCOPUS:85098710267
SN - 0167-6806
VL - 186
SP - 417
EP - 428
JO - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
JF - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
IS - 2
ER -