TY - JOUR
T1 - Robotic appendectomy in gynaecological surgery
T2 - Technique and pathological findings
AU - Akl, Mohamed N.
AU - Magrina, Javier F.
AU - Kho, Rosanne M.
AU - Magtibay, Paul M.
PY - 2008/9/1
Y1 - 2008/9/1
N2 - Background: We evaluated the feasibility, safety and pathological findings of incidental robotic appendectomy in patients undergoing robotic gynaecological surgery. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 107 consecutive cases of robotic appendectomy done in conjunction with other robotic gynaecological procedures between May 2004 and January 2007. Results: All appendectomies were performed robotically in conjunction with other robotic procedures. Mean time for appendectomy was 3.4 min. No perioperative complications related to appendectomy were encountered. Among 90 patients with no gynaecological malignancy, 57 patients reported chronic pelvic pain preoperatively and 21 (37%) of them had an abnormal appendiceal pathology as compared to only 5 (15%) of the 33 patients with no pelvic pain (OR. 3.2; 95% CI, 1.1-9.7, p = 0.032). Of seven patients with ovarian malignancy, three (42%) had appendicular metastasis. Conclusion: Incidental robotic appendectomy can be performed safely without the need for switching to conventional laparoscopy. It should be considered in patients undergoing robotic pelvic surgery for pelvic pain and ovarian malignancy.
AB - Background: We evaluated the feasibility, safety and pathological findings of incidental robotic appendectomy in patients undergoing robotic gynaecological surgery. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 107 consecutive cases of robotic appendectomy done in conjunction with other robotic gynaecological procedures between May 2004 and January 2007. Results: All appendectomies were performed robotically in conjunction with other robotic procedures. Mean time for appendectomy was 3.4 min. No perioperative complications related to appendectomy were encountered. Among 90 patients with no gynaecological malignancy, 57 patients reported chronic pelvic pain preoperatively and 21 (37%) of them had an abnormal appendiceal pathology as compared to only 5 (15%) of the 33 patients with no pelvic pain (OR. 3.2; 95% CI, 1.1-9.7, p = 0.032). Of seven patients with ovarian malignancy, three (42%) had appendicular metastasis. Conclusion: Incidental robotic appendectomy can be performed safely without the need for switching to conventional laparoscopy. It should be considered in patients undergoing robotic pelvic surgery for pelvic pain and ovarian malignancy.
KW - Incidental appendectomy
KW - Pathological findings
KW - Robotic appendectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54949087095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54949087095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/rcs.198
DO - 10.1002/rcs.198
M3 - Article
C2 - 18613274
AN - SCOPUS:54949087095
SN - 1478-5951
VL - 4
SP - 210
EP - 213
JO - International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
JF - International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
IS - 3
ER -