Reliability of goniometric measurements of active arm elevation in the scapular plane obtained in a clinical setting

James W. Youdas, James R. Carey, Tom R. Garrett, Vera J. Suman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Our purpose was to determine the intratester and intertester reliability of measurements of both scapular and glenohumeral rotation during active arm elevation in the scapular plane with a new device, the scapulohumeral goniometer (SHG). Ten physical therapists, with 1 to 29 years of clinical experience, obtained repeated measurements on 45 subjects who were 27 to 82 years old. All subjects were tested in uniform standing position with the handheld SHG, which was positioned over the subject's scapula and posterior shoulder according to operationally defined landmarks. For both scapular and glenohumeral rotation, 50% of the time the first and second measurements made on a patient by the same physical therapist differed by 3° or more. Ten percent of the time, these measurements differed by 8° or more. Measurements of active range of movement of scapular and glenohumeral rotation made by the same physical therapist during arm elevation in the scapular plane are clinically unacceptable when obtained with the current techniques for positioning the SHG. Clinical decisions based on results of active scapular and humeral motion in the scapular plane as measured on a patient by the same therapist with an SHG should be made with caution, because of the variability associated with this procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1137-1144
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume75
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1994

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of goniometric measurements of active arm elevation in the scapular plane obtained in a clinical setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this