Abstract
Brain potentials were recorded from 12 normal subjects engaged in an auditory target detection task (target stimulus probability of 0.2, stimulus rate of 1 every 2 sec) when instructions were (1) to press a response button with the thumb of the dominant hand to each target or (2) to keep a mental count of each target. A pre-stimulus slow negative potential was identified before every stimulus except non-targets immediately after targets. The amplitude of the pre-stimulus negativity was significantly affected by task instructions and was up to 4 times larger during the button press than the mental count condition. In contrast, the amplitudes and latencies of the event-related components (N100, P200, N200 and P300), when slow potentials were removed by filtering, were not different as a function of press or count instructions. The immediately preceding stimulus sequence affected both the amplitude and onset latency of the pre-stimulus negativity; both measures increased as the number of preceding non-targets increased. The amplitude of the pre-stimulus negative shift to targets also increased significantly as RT speed decreased. The major portion of the pre-stimulus negative potential is considered a readiness potential (RP) reflecting preparations to make a motor response. The amplitude of the RP during the target detection task did not significantly lateralize in contrast to the RP accompanying self-paced movements.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 76-92 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/ Evoked Potentials |
| Volume | 96 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1995 |
Keywords
- Event-related potentials
- P300
- Reaction time
- Readiness potentials
- Target detection
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Neuroscience
- Clinical Neurology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Readiness to respond in a target detection task: pre- and post-stimulus event-related potentials in normal subjects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS