TY - JOUR
T1 - Present and future of the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis
T2 - the imaging perspective
AU - Filippi, Massimo
AU - Preziosa, Paolo
AU - Arnold, Douglas L.
AU - Barkhof, Frederik
AU - Harrison, Daniel M.
AU - Maggi, Pietro
AU - Mainero, Caterina
AU - Montalban, Xavier
AU - Sechi, Elia
AU - Weinshenker, Brian G.
AU - Rocca, Maria A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper reports the conclusions of the “Magnetic Resonance Techniques in Multiple Sclerosis, Twenty-third Advanced Course”, held in Milan, Italy, in November 3 2021. The authors had the following roles: Chair, Massimo Filippi Speakers, D. L. Arnold, F. Barkhof, D.M. Harrison, P. Maggi, C. Mainero, X. Montalban, E. Sechi, B.G. Weinshenker, M.A. Rocca; Discussants , P. Preziosa. The course was supported by unrestricted education grants from Biogen and Merck. The Sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. F. Barkhof is supported by the NIHR biomedical research centre at UCLH. rd
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - In recent years, the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis (MS) has evolved considerably. The 2017 McDonald criteria show high sensitivity and accuracy in predicting a second clinical attack in patients with a typical clinically isolated syndrome and allow an earlier diagnosis of MS. They have been validated, are evidence-based, simplify the clinical use of MRI criteria and improve MS patients’ management. However, to limit the risk of misdiagnosis, they should be applied by expert clinicians only after the careful exclusion of alternative diagnoses. Recently, new MRI markers have been proposed to improve diagnostic specificity for MS and reduce the risk of misdiagnosis. The central vein sign and chronic active lesions (i.e., paramagnetic rim lesions) may increase the specificity of MS diagnostic criteria, but further effort is necessary to validate and standardize their assessment before implementing them in the clinical setting. The feasibility of subpial demyelination assessment and the clinical relevance of leptomeningeal enhancement evaluation in the diagnostic work-up of MS appear more limited. Artificial intelligence tools may capture MRI attributes that are beyond the human perception, and, in the future, artificial intelligence may complement human assessment to further ameliorate the diagnostic work-up and patients’ classification. However, guidelines that ensure reliability, interpretability, and validity of findings obtained from artificial intelligence approaches are still needed to implement them in the clinical scenario. This review provides a summary of the most recent updates regarding the application of MRI for the diagnosis of MS.
AB - In recent years, the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis (MS) has evolved considerably. The 2017 McDonald criteria show high sensitivity and accuracy in predicting a second clinical attack in patients with a typical clinically isolated syndrome and allow an earlier diagnosis of MS. They have been validated, are evidence-based, simplify the clinical use of MRI criteria and improve MS patients’ management. However, to limit the risk of misdiagnosis, they should be applied by expert clinicians only after the careful exclusion of alternative diagnoses. Recently, new MRI markers have been proposed to improve diagnostic specificity for MS and reduce the risk of misdiagnosis. The central vein sign and chronic active lesions (i.e., paramagnetic rim lesions) may increase the specificity of MS diagnostic criteria, but further effort is necessary to validate and standardize their assessment before implementing them in the clinical setting. The feasibility of subpial demyelination assessment and the clinical relevance of leptomeningeal enhancement evaluation in the diagnostic work-up of MS appear more limited. Artificial intelligence tools may capture MRI attributes that are beyond the human perception, and, in the future, artificial intelligence may complement human assessment to further ameliorate the diagnostic work-up and patients’ classification. However, guidelines that ensure reliability, interpretability, and validity of findings obtained from artificial intelligence approaches are still needed to implement them in the clinical scenario. This review provides a summary of the most recent updates regarding the application of MRI for the diagnosis of MS.
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Multiple sclerosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142476316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142476316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00415-022-11488-y
DO - 10.1007/s00415-022-11488-y
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36427168
AN - SCOPUS:85142476316
SN - 0340-5354
VL - 270
SP - 1286
EP - 1299
JO - Journal of Neurology
JF - Journal of Neurology
IS - 3
ER -